Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36788715›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2024

Hybrid Closed Loop Using a Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Natalie Nanayakkara, Amin Sharifi, David Burren, Yasser Elghattis, Dulari K Jayarathna, Neale Cohen

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress on automated insulin delivery system in the field of diabetes management].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie NanayakkaraDepartment of Diabetes Clinical Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-9917
Amin SharifiDepartment of Diabetes Clinical Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David BurrenDepartment of Diabetes Clinical Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yasser ElghattisDepartment of Diabetes Clinical Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8351-4784
Dulari K JayarathnaDepartment of Diabetes Clinical Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Neale CohenDepartment of Diabetes Clinical Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is increasing use of open-source artificial pancreas systems (APS) in the management of Type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of the automated insulin delivery system AndroidAPS (AAPS), compared with stand-alone pump therapy in people with type 1 diabetes. The primary outcome was the difference in the percentage of time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary aims included mean sensor glucose value and percent continuous glucose monitor (CGM) time below range (TBR, <70 mg/dL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis open-label single-center randomized crossover study (ANZCTR, Australian New Zealand clinical trial registry, ANZCTR-ACTRN12620001191987) comprised 20 participants with type 1 diabetes on established pump therapy, assigned to either stand-alone insulin pump therapy or the open-source AAPS hybrid closed-loop system for four weeks, with crossover to the alternate arm for the following four weeks. The CGM outcome parameters were measured by seven-day CGM at baseline and the final week of each four-week study arm.

resultsTwenty participants were recruited (60% women), aged 45.8 ± 15.9 years, with mean diabetes duration of 23.9 ± 13.2 years, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.5% ± 0.5% (58 ± 6 mmol/mol) and mean TIR 62.3% ± 12.9%. The change in TIR from baseline for AAPS compared with stand-alone pump therapy was 18.6% (11.4-25.9), (

conclusionsThis clinical trial of the open-source AAPS hybrid closed-loop system performed in an at-home setting demonstrated comparable safety to stand-alone pump therapy. The glycemic outcomes of AAPS were superior with improved TIR, and there was no significant difference in TBR compared with stand-alone pump therapy.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsPancreas, ArtificialAdultFemaleGlycemic ControlHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinartificial pancreas systemscontinuous glucose monitoringinsulin pump therapytime in range

Identifiers

PMID36788715
PMCPMC11307222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.