Evidence mapPaperPMID 36789288Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

A platform for phenotyping disease progression and associated longitudinal risk factors in large-scale EHRs, with application to incident diabetes complications in the UK Biobank.

Do Hyun Kim, Aubrey Jensen, Kelly Jones, Sridharan Raghavan, Lawrence S Phillips, Adriana Hung, Yan V Sun, Gang Li, Peter Reaven, Hua Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhancing patient representation learning with inferred family pedigrees improves disease risk prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Do Hyun KimDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6716-7962
Aubrey JensenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kelly JonesDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Sridharan RaghavanDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Lawrence S PhillipsDivision of Endocrinology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Adriana HungVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yan V SunDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-1824
Gang LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Peter ReavenPhoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Hua ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jin J ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7983-0274

Funding

Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2002 to 2025
$1.3M
Modeling, Inference, and Optimization for Genomic and Biomedical Big DataR35GM141798 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2025 to 2025
$539k
Diabetic Complications and Genetic Variants in the Million Veterans ProgramI01BX005831 · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · 2025 to 2025
Genetics of CKD and Hypertension-Risk Prediction and Drug Response in the MVPI01CX001897 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · 2021 to 2025
BLRD VA I01 BX005831CSRD VA I01 CX001737CSRD VA I01 CX001897NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006139NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Modern healthcare data reflect massive multi-level and multi-scale information collected over many years. The majority of the existing phenotyping algorithms use case-control definitions of disease. This paper aims to study the time to disease onset and progression and identify the time-varying risk factors that drive them. Materials and Methods: We developed an algorithmic approach to phenotyping the incidence of diseases by consolidating data sources from the UK Biobank (UKB), including primary care electronic health records (EHRs). We focused on defining events, event dates, and their censoring time, including relevant terms and existing phenotypes, excluding generic, rare, or semantically distant terms, forward-mapping terminology terms, and expert review. We applied our approach to phenotyping diabetes complications, including a composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome, diabetic kidney disease (DKD), and diabetic retinopathy (DR), in the UKB study. Results: We identified 49 049 participants with diabetes. Among them, 1023 had type 1 diabetes (T1D), and 40 193 had type 2 diabetes (T2D). A total of 23 833 diabetes subjects had linked primary care records. There were 3237, 3113, and 4922 patients with CVD, DKD, and DR events, respectively. The risk prediction performance for each outcome was assessed, and our results are consistent with the prediction area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve (AUC) of standard risk prediction models using cohort studies. Discussion and Conclusion: Our publicly available pipeline and platform enable streamlined curation of incidence events, identification of time-varying risk factors underlying disease progression, and the definition of a relevant cohort for time-to-event analyses. These important steps need to be considered simultaneously to study disease progression.

Indexed as

diabetesdiabetes complicationsdisease progressionelectronic health recordsphenotypingtime-to-event

Identifiers

PMID36789288
PMCPMC9912368

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.