Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36793080›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Experiences with telemedicine for HIV care in two federally qualified health centers in Los Angeles: a qualitative study.

Daisy Walker, Corrina Moucheraud, Derrick Butler, Jerome de Vente, Kevin Tangonan, Steven Shoptaw, Judith S Currier, Jay Gladstein, Risa Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daisy WalkerDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. daisywalker@mednet.ucla.edu.
Corrina MoucheraudDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Derrick ButlerTo Help Everyone, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jerome de VenteAPLA Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kevin TangonanAPLA Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Steven ShoptawDepartment of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Judith S CurrierDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jay GladsteinAPLA Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Risa HoffmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in an increase in telemedicine utilization for routine HIV care. However, there is limited information on perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine from United States (U.S.) federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) offering HIV care. We sought to understand telemedicine experiences of stakeholders with various roles: people living with HIV (PLHIV), clinical (clinicians and case managers), programmatic (clinic administrators), and policy (policymakers).

methodsQualitative interviews about benefits and challenges of telemedicine (telephone and video) for HIV care were conducted with 31 PLHIV and 23 other stakeholders (clinicians, case managers, clinic administrators, and policymakers). Interviews were transcribed, translated to English if conducted in Spanish, coded, and analyzed for major themes.

resultsAlmost all PLHIV felt capable of engaging in telephone visits, with some expressing interest in learning how to use video visits as well. Nearly all PLHIV wanted to continue telemedicine as part of their routine HIV care, and this was also endorsed by clinical, programmatic and policy stakeholders. Interviewees agreed that telemedicine for HIV care has benefits for PLHIV, especially savings of time and transportation costs, which also reduced stress. Clinical, programmatic, and policy stakeholders expressed concerns around patients' technological literacy and resources, as well as their access to privacy, and some felt that PLHIV strongly preferred in-person visits. These stakeholders also commonly reported clinic-level implementation challenges, including integrating telephone and video telemedicine into workflows and difficulty with video visit platforms.

conclusionsTelemedicine for HIV care, largely delivered via telephone (audio-only), was highly acceptable and feasible for both PLHIV, clinicians, and other stakeholders. Addressing barriers for stakeholders in incorporating video visits will be important for the successful implementation of telemedicine with video as part of routine HIV care at FQHCs.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsTelemedicineHumansLos AngelesSARS-CoV-2United StatesBenefitsChallengesHIVQualitativeTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36793080
PMCPMC9930012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.