Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797330›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Imaging of muscle injuries in sports medicine].

Rafael Heiss, Rolf Janka, Michael Uder, Thilo Hotfiel, Lena Gast, Armin M Nagel, Frank W Roemer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael HeissRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. rafael.heiss@uk-erlangen.de.
Rolf JankaRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Michael UderRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Thilo HotfielUnfallchirurgische und Orthopädische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Lena GastRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Armin M NagelRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Frank W RoemerRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEBoston University · USHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis of muscle injuries is indispensable in order to initiate appropriate treatment and to facilitate optimal healing. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to provide an update on imaging of muscle injuries in sports medicine with a focus on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to present experimental approaches in addition to routine diagnostic procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsA PubMed literature search for the years 2012-2022 using the following keywords was performed: muscle, muscle injury, muscle imaging, muscle injury classification, delayed onset muscle soreness, ultrasound, MRI, sodium MRI, potassium MRI, ultra-high-field MRI, injuries of athletes.

resultsImaging is crucial to confirm and assess the extent of sports-related muscle injuries and may help establishing treatment decisions, which directly affect the prognosis. This is of importance when the diagnosis or grade of injury is unclear, when recovery is taking longer than expected, and when interventional or surgical management may be necessary. In addition to established methods such as B‑mode ultrasound and

conclusionB‑mode ultrasound represents an easily available, cost-effective modality for the initial diagnosis of muscle injuries. MRI is still considered the reference standard and enables an accurate morphological assessment of the extent of the injury. There are still no imaging approaches available for the objective determination of the optimal point of return to play.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesSports MedicineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusclesUltrasonographyMagnetic resonance imagingMuscle lesionsSeverity classificationSports medicineUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36797330
OpenAlexW4321016155

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.