Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36797675›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Food taboos and their perceived reasons among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review, 2022.

Hadush Gebregziabher, Amaha Kahsay, Fereweini Gebrearegay, Kidanemaryam Berhe, Alem Gebremariam, Gebretsadkan Gebremedhin Gebretsadik

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Perceptions of African Migrant Women Regarding Food Consumption During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in Australia: A Qualitative Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hadush GebregziabherDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Amaha KahsayDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Fereweini GebrearegayDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Kidanemaryam BerheDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Alem GebremariamDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Tigray, Ethiopia.
Gebretsadkan Gebremedhin GebretsadikDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia. gere2023@gmail.com.
Mekelle University · ETAdigrat University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are foods considered as taboo across different communities in the world and in Ethiopia in particular. Although food taboos exist across all ages or physiologic states, they are predominant among pregnant women and children. Identifying such foods among pregnant women is crucial in providing focused interventions and prevents their negative consequences. Therefore, the aim of this review was to review the available evidence on food taboos and their perceived reasons among pregnant women in Ethiopia to provide comprehensive and precise evidence for decision making.

methodsElectronic search of the literature was made from Pub-Med, Google Scholar, Google Scopus, and Medline databases using search terms set based on the PICO/PS (Population, Intervention/exposure, Comparison, and Outcome) and PS (Population and Situation) search table. The search was made from December 05, 2020 - December, 29, 2021, and updated on January, 2022. All quantitative and qualitative studies published in English were included in the review. The systematic review protocol was registered at INPLASY (Registration number: INPLASY202310078). The outcome of interest was food taboo for pregnant women and its perceived reasons. The results of the review was narrated.

resultsAfter identifying eighty two articles, thirteen were found eligible for the review. Vegetables, fruits, and fatty foods like meat, and dairy products were considered as taboo for pregnant women in different parts of Ethiopia. The reasons stated for the food taboo vary from fear of having a big baby, obstructed labour, and abortion to evil eye and physical and aesthetic deformities in the newborn.

conclusionsThough not uniform across the country, there are foods considered as taboo for pregnant women in Ethiopia due to several perceived reasons, misconceptions, and societal influences. This could increase the risk of malnutrition and could have short and long term consequences on both the mother and her growing foetus. Therefore, context specific nutritional counseling with emphasis during ante-natal care and post-natal service is important.

Indexed as

MalnutritionPregnant PeopleChildEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyTabooVegetablesEthiopiaFood taboosPerceived reasonsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36797675
PMCPMC9933406
OpenAlexW4321087949

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.