ArticleJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research2022
Evaluation of respiratory function among homemakers exposed to indoor air pollution.
Article in Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occupational status and chronic respiratory diseases: a cross-sectional study based on the data of the Rafsanjan Cohort Study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Unseen crisis: Revealing the hidden health impact of indoor air pollution-A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indoor air contamination is a condition that can increase cardiovascular and respiratory mortality in the present-day population. Utilizing cooking exhaust in working environments, pollutants such as Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), incense sticks, cooking in fuel and kindling oven in the kitchen, and tobacco smoke are the significant reasons for indoor air contamination. The point of this study is to make mindfulness among homemakers presented to indoor air contamination. A spellbinding cross-sectional review including 100 homemaker female subjects in the age of 40-50 know about indoor air contamination. An overview was directed among 100 home creators in regard to indoor air contamination to make mindfulness. The strategy for testing done is basic arbitrary inspecting. The aftereffects of the current review showed that respondents were greatly presented to the indoor air contamination and created side effects connected with it and generally respondents in the age gathering of 40-50 years had encountered more exhaustion, dry bothersome skin, copying and aggravation of the eyes and stodgy nose, and affiliation was measurably huge. This finding revealed the indoor air toxins that can be considered to assume a part underway to infections like asthma, and so forth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.