ArticleEuropean radiology2023
1.5-T MR relaxometry in quantifying splenic and pancreatic iron: retrospective comparison of a commercial 3D-Dixon sequence and an established 2D multi-gradient echo sequence.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the quantitative measurement of splenic and pancreatic iron content using a commercial 3D-Dixon sequence (qDixon) versus an established fat-saturated R2* relaxometry method (ME-GRE).
methodsWe analyzed splenic and pancreatic iron levels in 143 MR examinations (1.5 T) using the qDixon and a ME-GRE sequence (108 patients: 65 males, 43 females, mean age 61.31 years). Splenic and pancreatic R2* values were compared between both methods using Bland-Altman plots, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), and linear regression analyses. Iron overload (R2* > 50 1/s) was defined for both organs and compared using contingency tables, overall agreement, and Gwet's AC1 coefficient.
resultsOf all analyzable examinations, the median splenic R2* using the qDixon sequence was 25.75 1/s (range: 5.6-433) and for the ME-GRE sequence 35.35 1/s (range: 10.9-400.8) respectively. Concerning the pancreas, a median R2* of 29.93 1/s (range: 14-111.45) for the qDixon and 31.25 1/s (range: 14-97) for the ME-GRE sequence was found. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean R2* difference of 2.12 1/s with a CCC of 0.934 for the spleen and of 0.29 1/s with a CCC of 0.714 for the pancreas. Linear regression for the spleen/pancreas resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.94 (p < 0.001)/0.725 (p < 0.001). Concerning iron overload, the proportion of overall agreement between the two methods was 91.43% for the spleen and 93.18% for the pancreas.
conclusionsOur data show good concordance between R2* values obtained with a commercial qDixon sequence and a validated ME-GRE relaxometry method. The 3D-qDixon sequence, originally intended for liver assessment, seems to be a reliable tool for non-invasive evaluation of iron content also in the spleen and the pancreas. KEY POINTS: • A 3D chemical shift imaging sequence and 2D multi-gradient echo sequence show good conformity quantifying splenic and pancreatic R2* values. • The 3D chemical shift imaging sequence allows a reliable analysis also of splenic and pancreatic iron status. • In addition to the liver, the analysis of the spleen and pancreas is often helpful for further differential diagnostic clarification and patient guidance regarding the iron status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.