Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36802779›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Molecular patterns and processes in evolving sociality: lessons from insects.

Seirian Sumner, Emeline Favreau, Katherine Geist, Amy L Toth, Sandra M Rehan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A multi-scale review of the dynamics of collective behaviour: from rapid responses to ontogeny and evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seirian SumnerCentre for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-2018
Emeline FavreauCentre for Biodiversity and Environmental Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Katherine GeistDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, and Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Amy L TothDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, and Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0824-0933
Sandra M RehanDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada M3J 1P3.ORCID 0000-0002-6441-5155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects have provided some of the clearest insights into the origins and evolution of collective behaviour. Over 20 years ago, Maynard Smith and Szathmáry defined the most complex form of insect social behaviour-superorganismality-among the eight major transitions in evolution that explain the emergence of biological complexity. However, the mechanistic processes underlying the transition from solitary life to superorganismal living in insects remain rather elusive. An overlooked question is whether this major transition arose via incremental or step-wise modes of evolution. We suggest that examination of the molecular processes underpinning different levels of social complexity represented across the major transition from solitary to complex sociality can help address this question. We present a framework for using molecular data to assess to what extent the mechanistic processes that take place in the major transition to complex sociality and superorganismality involve nonlinear (implying step-wise evolution) or linear (implying incremental evolution) changes in the underlying molecular mechanisms. We assess the evidence for these two modes using data from social insects and discuss how this framework can be used to test the generality of molecular patterns and processes across other major transitions. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Collective behaviour through time'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSocial BehaviorAnimalsInsectacollective behaviourgenomicsmajor transitionmodes of evolutionsocialitysuperorganismality

Identifiers

PMID36802779
PMCPMC9939270

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.