ReviewCardio-oncology (London, England)2023
Efficacy and safety of cardioprotective drugs in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: an updated systematic review & network meta-analysis.
Review in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Cardiovascular medications and treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: insights from phase III clinical trials.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Strain surveillance during chemotherapy to improve cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR-MRI trial.European heart journal · 2024Trial
- Balancing Oncological Care and Quality of Life: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Uro-Oncology Treatments-A Primer for the Clinician.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of cancer history on coronary calcification and clinical outcomes in intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.Coronary artery disease · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of cardiac biomarkers in therapy‑related cardiotoxicity: a prospective cardio‑oncology cohort study.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Patterns Among People With Cancer in New South Wales, Australia: A Population-Wide Data Linkage Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Precision Monitoring Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Review of Molecular Indicators for Early Detection and Risk Stratification.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Remodeling: Mechanisms and Mitigation Strategies.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- The mechanisms and therapeutic advances of interactions between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- SGLT-2 inhibitors in prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Pharmacological prevention in cardio-oncology: from bench-to-bedside.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Overview on Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Insights into the Underlying Inflammatory and Oxidative Mechanisms.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Medication and Health Service Use in Individuals With Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Cardioprotection with nebivolol in patients undergoing anthracyclines: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.Cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- The Potential Role of GLP1-RAs Against Anticancer-Drug Cardiotoxicity: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cancer-Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction: Latest Advances in Prevention and Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Natural language processing of electronic medical records identifies cardioprotective agents for anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Current strategies for prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity: pharmacological, non-pharmacological and emerging approaches.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer patients receiving chemotherapy have an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. This limits the widespread use of lifesaving therapies, often necessitating alternate lower efficacy regimens, or precluding chemotherapy entirely. Prior studies have suggested that using common cardioprotective agents may attenuate chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. However, small sample sizes and conflicting outcomes have limited the clinical significance of these results. HYPOTHESIS: A comprehensive network meta-analysis using updated and high-quality data can provide more conclusive information to assess which drug or drug class has the most significant effect in the management of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.
methodsWe performed a literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of cardioprotective agents in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. We used established analytical tools (netmeta package in RStudio) and data extraction formats to analyze the outcome data. To obviate systematic bias in the selection and interpretation of RCTs, we employed the validated Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. Agents included were statins, aldosterone receptor antagonists (MRAs), ACEIs, ARBs, and beta-blockers. Outcomes examined were improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters of cardiac function including a decreased reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), clinical HF, troponin-I, and B-natriuretic peptide levels.
resultsOur study included 33 RCTs including a total of 3,285 patients. Compared to control groups, spironolactone therapy was associated with the greatest LVEF improvement (Mean difference (MD) = 12.80, [7.90; 17.70]), followed by enalapril (MD = 7.62, [5.31; 9.94]), nebivolol (MD = 7.30, [2.39; 12.21]), and statins (MD = 6.72, [3.58; 9.85]). Spironolactone was also associated with a significant reduction in troponin elevation (MD = - 0.01, [- 0.02; - 0.01]). Enalapril demonstrated the greatest BNP reduction (MD = - 49.00, [- 68.89; - 29.11]), which was followed by spironolactone (MD = - 16.00, [- 23.9; - 8.10]). Additionally, patients on enalapril had the lowest risk of developing clinical HF compared to the control population (RR = 0.05, [0.00; 0.75]).
conclusionOur analysis reaffirmed that statins, MRAs, ACEIs, and beta-blockers can significantly attenuate chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity, while ARBs showed no significant effects. Spironolactone showed the most robust improvement of LVEF, which best supports its use among this population. Our analysis warrants future clinical studies examining the cardioprotective effects of cardiac remodeling therapy in cancer patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.