ArticleAnnals of hematology2023
Prognostic value of interim
Article in Annals of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of PET/CT parameters and a clinical variable to predict the risk of progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) in follicular lymphoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Interim PET in follicular lymphoma: more patience, please.Annals of hematology · 2023Article
- Duodenal-type follicular lymphoma inAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe prognostic value of interim
methodsI-PET was performed in 30 adult FL patients after treatment with 3-5 cycles of R-CHOP. PET/CT images were assessed using the Deauville 5-point scale (D-5PS) criteria. Baseline PET/CT (B-PET) was performed in 24 of the patients with FL before treatment. The PET/CT image parameters, such as the SUVmax, TLG, and tMTV, were recorded. The prognostic values of sex, age, grade, Ann Arbor stage, LDH level, and I-PET were evaluated.
resultsKaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression showed that sex, age, grade, Ann Arbor stage, LDH, and I-PET using the D-5PS criteria could not predict the PFS of adult patients with FL treated with R-CHOP (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis evaluated the predictive values of SUVmax, TLG, and tMTV in B-PET and I-PET and showed that none of them was predictive of PFS in adult FL patients (P>0.05). However, the variation in SUVmax (∆SUVmax) was predictive of PFS in adult FL patients (AUC=0.83, P=0.040), and the cutoff threshold was 4.85.
conclusionsI-PET using the D-5PS criteria cannot predict the PFS of adult FL patients treated with R-CHOP. However, the ∆SUVmax between B-PET and I-PET is applicable for the prognosis of adult patients with FL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.