Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36807952›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2023

Paediatric sleep apnea event prediction using nasal air pressure and machine learning.

Matthew G Crowson, Kevin S Gipson, Orna Katz Kadosh, Elizabeth Hartnick, Ellen Grealish, Donald G Keamy, Thomas Bernard Kinane, Christopher J Hartnick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current role of artificial intelligence and machine learning: is their application feasible in pediatric upper airway obstructive disorders?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew G CrowsonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mass Eye & Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9950-0985
Kevin S GipsonDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Orna Katz KadoshDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mass Eye & Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth HartnickBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Ellen GrealishMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Donald G KeamyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mass Eye & Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Thomas Bernard KinaneDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher J HartnickDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mass Eye & Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USBoston Children's Hospital · USBrown University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING-MEDICAL INFORMATICS 90T15LM007092 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Nils Gehlenborg · 1992 to 2026
$32.8M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep-disordered breathing is an important health issue for children. The objective of this study was to develop a machine learning classifier model for the identification of sleep apnea events taken exclusively from nasal air pressure measurements acquired during overnight polysomnography for paediatric patients. A secondary objective of this study was to differentiate site of obstruction exclusively from hypopnea event data using the model. Computer vision classifiers were developed via transfer learning to either normal breathing while asleep, obstructive hypopnea, obstructive apnea or central apnea. A separate model was trained to identify site of obstruction as either adeno-tonsillar or tongue base. In addition, a survey of board-certified and board-eligible sleep physicians was completed to compare clinician versus model classification performance of sleep events, and indicated very good performance of our model relative to human raters. The nasal air pressure sample database available for modelling comprised 417 normal, 266 obstructive hypopnea, 122 obstructive apnea and 131 central apnea events derived from 28 paediatric patients. The four-way classifier achieved a mean prediction accuracy of 70.0% (95% confidence interval [67.1-72.9]). Clinician raters correctly identified sleep events from nasal air pressure tracings 53.8% of the time, whereas the local model was 77.5% accurate. The site of obstruction classifier achieved a mean prediction accuracy of 75.0% (95% confidence interval [68.7-81.3]). Machine learning applied to nasal air pressure tracings is feasible and may exceed the diagnostic performance of expert clinicians. Nasal air pressure tracings of obstructive hypopneas may "encode" information regarding the site of obstruction, which may only be discernable by machine learning.

Indexed as

Sleep Apnea, CentralSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSleep Apnea SyndromesAir PressureChildHumansMachine Learningmachine learningnasal air pressurepolysomnographysleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID36807952
PMCPMC10363180
OpenAlexW4321458312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.