Evidence mapPaperPMID 36811591Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Nutritional benefits of sourdoughs: A systematic review.

Léa Ribet, Robin Dessalles, Corinne Lesens, Nele Brusselaers, Mickaël Durand-Dubief

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synergistic Interaction BetweenFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sourdough Bread Quality: Facts and Factors.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. A Functional Bread Fermented withCurrent developments in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Léa RibetBaking Science, Lesaffre Institute of Science & Technology, Lesaffre, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Robin DessallesRobin Dessalles EI, Lyon, France.
Corinne LesensBaking Science, Lesaffre Institute of Science & Technology, Lesaffre, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Nele BrusselaersGlobal Health Institute, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre for Translational Microbiome Research (CTMR), Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Mickaël Durand-DubiefDiscovery & Front End Innovation, Lesaffre Institute of Science & Technology, Lesaffre, Marcq-en-Barœul, France. Electronic address: m.duranddubief@lesaffre.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food fermentation using sourdough-i.e., consortia of lactic bacteria and yeasts-is increasingly considered among the public as a natural transformation yielding nutritional benefits; however, it is unclear whether its alleged properties are validated by science. The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinical evidence related to the effect of sourdough bread on health. Bibliographic searches were performed in 2 different databases (The Lens and PubMed) up to February 2022. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials involving adults, healthy or not, given any type of sourdough bread compared with those given any type of yeast bread. A total of 573 articles were retrieved and investigated, of which 25 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. The 25 clinical trials included a total of 542 individuals. The main outcomes investigated in the retrieved studies were glucose response (N = 15), appetite (N = 3), gastrointestinal markers (N = 5), and cardiovascular markers (N = 2). Overall, it is currently difficult to establish a clear consensus with regards to the beneficial effects of sourdough per se on health when compared with other types of bread because a variety of factors, such as the microbial composition of sourdough, fermentation parameters, cereals, and flour types potentially influence the nutritional properties of bread. Nonetheless, in studies using specific strains and fermentation conditions, significant improvements were observed in parameters related to glycemic response, satiety, or gastrointestinal comfort after bread ingestion. The reviewed data suggest that sourdough has great potential to produce a variety of functional foods; however, its complex and dynamic ecosystem requires further standardization to conclude its clinical health benefits.

Indexed as

EcosystemLactobacillusBreadFermentationFlourHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYeastsbreadclinical trialsfermentationglycemic responselactic bacteriamicrobiotasatietysourdoughyeast

Identifiers

PMID36811591
PMCPMC10103004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.