Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814713›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

MSC-Exos: Important active factor of bone regeneration.

Sihang Ren, Yuyang Lin, Wenyue Liu, Liqun Yang, Muxin Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  4. Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Anatomical implant region - a critical determinant for the osteogenic potency of small extracellular vesicles and rhBMP-2.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Isolation methods of exosomes derived from dental stem cells.International journal of oral science · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sihang RenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yuyang LinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Wenyue LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Liqun YangNHC Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Medical Genetics (China Medical University), Liaoning Research Institute of Family Planning (The Affiliated Reproductive Hospital of China Medical University), Shenyang, China.
Muxin ZhaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Dalian Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defect and repair is a common but difficult problem in restorative and reconstructive surgery. Bone tissue defects of different sizes caused by different reasons bring functional limitations and cosmetic deformities to patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), a major hotspot in the field of regeneration in recent years, have been widely used in various studies on bone tissue regeneration. Numerous studies have shown that the bone regenerative effects of MSC can be achieved through exosome-delivered messages. Although its osteogenic mechanism is still unclear, it is clear that MSC-Exos can directly or indirectly support the action of bone regeneration. It can act directly on various cells associated with osteogenesis, or by carrying substances that affect cellular activators or the local internal environment in target cells, or it can achieve activation of the osteogenic framework by binding to materials. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the types and content of effective contents of MSC-Exos in bone regeneration, as well as recent advances in the currently commonly used methods to enable the binding of MSC-Exos to the framework and to conclude that MSC-Exos is effective in promoting osteogenesis.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbone regenarationmesenchyaml stem cellsMSC-Exososteogenic cells

Identifiers

PMID36814713
PMCPMC9939647
OpenAlexW4319321507

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.