ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023
DeepAD: A deep learning application for predicting amyloid standardized uptake value ratio through PET for Alzheimer's prognosis.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging Advanced AI Frameworks for Dual PPAR α/γ Agonist Discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Impact of adjunctive quantitative analysis on visual interpretation of amyloid PET: a multiple tracer, multicentre study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Next generation preventive neurology: how artificial intelligence and machine learning are reshaping Alzheimer's disease research.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2026Review
- A comparative evaluation of deep learning approaches for ophthalmology.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- Generative AI unlocks PET insights: brain amyloid dynamics and quantification.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Aided Neuroimaging and Brain Regulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Amyloid deposition is a vital biomarker in the process of Alzheimer's diagnosis. Materials and methods: Using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified 2,980 patients with PET imaging, clinical, and genetic data. We tested various ResNet, EfficientNet, and RegNet convolutional neural networks and later combined the best performing model with Gradient Boosting Decision Tree algorithms to predict standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of amyloid in each patient session. We tried several configurations to find the best model tuning for regression-to-SUVR. Results: We found that the RegNet X064 architecture combined with a grid search-tuned Gradient Boosting Decision Tree with 3 axial input slices and clinical and genetic data achieved the lowest loss. Using the mean-absolute-error metric, the loss converged to an MAE of 0.0441, equating to 96.4% accuracy across the 596-patient test set. Discussion: We showed that this method is more consistent and accessible in comparison to human readers from previous studies, with lower margins of error and substantially faster calculation times. We implemented our deep learning model on to a web application named DeepAD which allows our diagnostic tool to be accessible. DeepAD could be used in hospitals and clinics with resource limitations for amyloid deposition and shows promise for more imaging tasks as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.