Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817431›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Agonistic and antagonistic targeting of immune checkpoint molecules differentially regulate osteoclastogenesis.

Victoria C Brom, Andreas C Strauss, Alexander Sieberath, Jochen Salber, Christof Burger, Dieter C Wirtz, Frank A Schildberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Bone mineral density changes following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: insights from a case series analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria C BromClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas C StraussClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander SieberathDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Centre for Clinical Research, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Jochen SalberDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Centre for Clinical Research, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christof BurgerClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dieter C WirtzClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Frank A SchildbergClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are used in the treatment of various cancers and have been extensively researched with regard to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, this revolutionary therapeutic strategy often provokes critical auto-inflammatory adverse events, such as inflammatory reactions affecting the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous, and skeletal systems. Because the function of these immunomodulatory co-receptors is highly cell-type specific and the role of macrophages as osteoclast precursors is widely published, we aimed to analyze the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors on these bone-resorbing cells. Methods: We established an Results: These methodical approaches for osteoclast research achieved objective, comparable, and reproducible results despite the great heterogeneity in the form, size, and number of osteoclasts. In addition to the standardization of experimental analyses involving osteoclasts, our study has revealed the substantial effects of agonistic and antagonistic checkpoint modulation on osteoclastogenesis, confirming the importance of immune checkpoints in bone homeostasis. Discussion: Our work will enable more robust and reproducible investigations into the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in conditions with diminished bone density such as osteoporosis, aseptic loosening of endoprostheses, cancer, as well as the side effects of cancer therapy, and might even pave the way for novel individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionOsteogenesisHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint ProteinsLeukocytes, MononuclearOsteoclastsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint Proteinscancerendoprosthesis looseningimmune checkpoint moleculesmusculoskeletal immunologyosteoclastsosteoimmunologyosteolysisosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID36817431
PMCPMC9931766
OpenAlexW4319040587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.