Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36818874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Phenotypic differences in the appearance of soft rice and its endosperm structural basis.

Peng Fan, Jian Xu, Zhijie Wang, Guodong Liu, Zhenzhen Zhang, Jinyu Tian, Haiyan Wei, Hongcheng Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng FanJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jian XuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Zhijie WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Guodong LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Zhenzhen ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jinyu TianJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Haiyan WeiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Hongcheng ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Yangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In view of the significant differences among genotypes in the appearance of soft rice, it is necessary to conduct research on the differences in the appearance quality of soft rice and their mechanisms. It can provide a theoretical basis for the selection and breeding of superior appearance varieties at a later stage. In order to clarify the differences in appearance phenotypes between different soft rice genotypes and structural basis of endosperm structures behind the differences, four soft rice varieties were selected in this study, including two varieties with good-appearance and two varieties with cloudy appearance. The differences in appearance phenotypes and endosperm structure in mature grains of soft rice with different appearance phenotypes were scientifically analyzed. The development process of their endosperm differences at the filling stage was investigated. The results show that the difference in the rice appearance of soft rice varieties mainly lay in the chalk-free seed transparency and chalkiness. These differences were caused by two completely different types of endosperm structure. Fewer and smaller starch grain cavities were responsible for higher chalk-free transparency of soft rice grains, denser starch granules arrangement caused lower chalkiness of soft rice grains. Ten days after flowering, the starch granules in the back and heart of good-appearance soft rice were already significantly fuller and more closely packed than those of cloudy soft rice. At the same time, the number and area of starch granule holes were significantly smaller than those of cloudy soft rice. This difference gradually increased until maturity. Therefore, based on appearance evaluation, soft rice with good-appearance should have higher transparency and lower chalkiness. The endosperm starch granules should be full and tightly arranged. The number of starch grain cavities and the area should be smaller. These differences develop in the early stages of grouting and gradually increase.

Indexed as

appearance qualityendosperm structureformation mechanismrice fillingsoft rice

Identifiers

PMID36818874
PMCPMC9929301
OpenAlexW4318823773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.