Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36819660›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence review2023

An extensive survey on the use of supervised machine learning techniques in the past two decades for prediction of drug side effects.

Pranab Das, Dilwar Hussain Mazumder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pranab DasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Nagaland, Chumukedima, Dimapur, Nagaland 797103 India.
Dilwar Hussain MazumderDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Nagaland, Chumukedima, Dimapur, Nagaland 797103 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approved drugs for sale must be effective and safe, implying that the drug's advantages outweigh its known harmful side effects. Side effects (SE) of drugs are one of the common reasons for drug failure that may halt the whole drug discovery pipeline. The side effects might vary from minor concerns like a runny nose to potentially life-threatening issues like liver damage, heart attack, and death. Therefore, predicting the side effects of the drug is vital in drug development, discovery, and design. Supervised machine learning-based side effects prediction task has recently received much attention since it reduces time, chemical waste, design complexity, risk of failure, and cost. The advancement of supervised learning approaches for predicting side effects have emerged as essential computational tools. Supervised machine learning technique provides early information on drug side effects to develop an effective drug based on drug properties. Still, there are several challenges to predicting drug side effects. Thus, a near-exhaustive survey is carried out in this paper on the use of supervised machine learning approaches employed in drug side effects prediction tasks in the past two decades. In addition, this paper also summarized the drug descriptor required for the side effects prediction task, commonly utilized drug properties sources, computational models, and their performances. Finally, the research gap, open problems, and challenges for the further supervised learning-based side effects prediction task have been discussed.

Indexed as

Deep learningDrug propertiesDrug side effectsMachine learningSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID36819660
PMCPMC9930028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.