Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36821771›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2023

Inferring Balancing Selection From Genome-Scale Data.

Bárbara D Bitarello, Débora Y C Brandt, Diogo Meyer, Aida M Andrés

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ancient DNA from shells reveals delayed genomic erosion and rapid immune adaptation in the critically endangered black abalone.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bárbara D BitarelloBiology Department, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-7676-9367
Débora Y C BrandtDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9565-7835
Diogo MeyerInstitute of Biosciences, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Aida M AndrésDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8590-9672

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/WW007703/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of genomic regions and genes that have evolved under natural selection is a fundamental objective in the field of evolutionary genetics. While various approaches have been established for the detection of targets of positive selection, methods for identifying targets of balancing selection, a form of natural selection that preserves genetic and phenotypic diversity within populations, have yet to be fully developed. Despite this, balancing selection is increasingly acknowledged as a significant driver of diversity within populations, and the identification of its signatures in genomes is essential for understanding its role in evolution. In recent years, a plethora of sophisticated methods has been developed for the detection of patterns of linked variation produced by balancing selection, such as high levels of polymorphism, altered allele-frequency distributions, and polymorphism sharing across divergent populations. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of classical and contemporary methods, offer guidance on the choice of appropriate methods, and discuss the importance of avoiding artifacts and of considering alternative evolutionary processes. The increasing availability of genome-scale datasets holds the potential to assist in the identification of new targets and the quantification of the prevalence of balancing selection, thus enhancing our understanding of its role in natural populations.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPolymorphism, GeneticGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenomeSelection, Geneticcomposite likelihood ratio testsgenetic variationheterozygote advantagenatural selectionpopulation genomicssummary statistics

Identifiers

PMID36821771
PMCPMC10063222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.