Evidence mapPaperPMID 36822821Full record

Observational studyHeart (British Cardiac Society)2023

Medications for specific phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction classified by a machine learning-based clustering model.

Yohei Sotomi, Shungo Hikoso, Daisaku Nakatani, Katsuki Okada, Tomoharu Dohi, Akihiro Sunaga, Hirota Kida, Taiki Sato, Yuki Matsuoka, Tetsuhisa Kitamura and 12 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Artificial intelligence in heart failure.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Yohei SotomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Shungo HikosoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan hikoso@cardiology.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-2284-1970
Daisaku NakataniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Katsuki OkadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Tomoharu DohiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Akihiro SunagaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hirota KidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Taiki SatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yuki MatsuokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0107-0580
Sho KomukaiDivision of Biomedical Statistics, Department of Integrated Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Masahiro SeoDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Masamichi YanoDivision of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Takaharu HayashiCardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Akito NakagawaDivision of Cardiology, Amagasaki Chuo Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Yusuke NakagawaDivision of Cardiology, Kawanishi City Medical Center, Kawanishi, Japan.
Shunsuke TamakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Japan.
Tomohito OhtaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yoshio YasumuraDivision of Cardiology, Amagasaki Chuo Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Takahisa YamadaDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
OCVC-Heart Failure Investigator

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur previously established machine learning-based clustering model classified heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) into four distinct phenotypes. Given the heterogeneous pathophysiology of HFpEF, specific medications may have favourable effects in specific phenotypes of HFpEF. We aimed to assess effectiveness of medications on clinical outcomes of the four phenotypes using a real-world HFpEF registry dataset.

methodsThis study is a posthoc analysis of the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, a prospective, multicentre, observational study. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of the following four types of postdischarge medication in the four different phenotypes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), beta blockers, mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists (MRA) and statins. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalisation.

resultsOf 1231 patients, 1100 (83 (IQR 77, 87) years, 604 females) were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up duration was 734 (398, 1108) days. The primary endpoint occurred in 528 patients (48.0%). Cox proportional hazard models with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting showed the following significant effectiveness of medication on the primary endpoint: MRA for phenotype 2 (weighted HR (wHR) 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.75, p=0.005); ACEi or ARB for phenotype 3 (wHR 0.66 0.48 to 0.92, p=0.014) and statin therapy for phenotype 3 (wHR 0.43 (0.21 to 0.88), p=0.020). No other medications had significant treatment effects in the four phenotypes.

conclusionsMachine learning-based clustering may have the potential to identify populations in which specific medications may be effective. This study suggests the effectiveness of MRA, ACEi or ARB and statin for specific phenotypes of HFpEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000021831.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAftercareAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansPatient DischargePhenotypeProspective StudiesStroke VolumeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHeart Failure

Identifiers

PMID36822821
PMCPMC10423528

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.