Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824442›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2023

Diabetic Macular Oedema Guidelines: An Australian Perspective.

Yew Sen Yuen, Jagjit Singh Gilhotra, Michelle Dalton, Jaskirat S Aujla, Hemal Mehta, Sanj Wickremasinghe, Gurmit Uppal, Jennifer Arnold, Fred Chen, Andrew Chang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Yew Sen YuenNational University Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-614X
Jagjit Singh GilhotraRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Michelle DaltonDalton & Associates Inc., Pennsylvania, USA.
Jaskirat S AujlaSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-6077
Hemal MehtaSave Sight Registries, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sanj WickremasingheCentre for Eye Research Australia, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Gurmit UppalMoreton Eye Group, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jennifer ArnoldMarsden Eye Specialists, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fred ChenCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Andrew ChangSydney Institute of Vision Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Samantha Fraser-BellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lyndell LimCentre for Eye Research Australia, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-685X
Janika ShahSydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ellie BowditchSave Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Geoffrey K BroadheadSave Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUIndependent Broadcasting Associates · USInstitute of Ophthalmology · MXLions Eye Institute · AUNational University Hospital · SGRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of people living with diabetes is expected to rise to 578 million by 2030 and to 700 million by 2045, exacting a severe socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems around the globe. This is also reflected in the increasing numbers of people with ocular complications of diabetes (namely, diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and diabetic retinopathy (DR)). In one study examining the global prevalence of DR, 35% of people with diabetes had some form of DR, 7% had PDR, 7% had DMO, and 10% were affected by these vision-threatening stages. In many regions of the world (Australia included), DR is one of the top three leading causes of vision loss amongst working age adults (20-74 years). In the management of DMO, the landmark ETDRS study demonstrated that moderate visual loss, defined as doubling of the visual angle, can be reduced by 50% or more by focal/grid laser photocoagulation. However, over the last 20 years, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and corticosteroid therapies have emerged as alternative options for the management of DMO and provided patients with choices that have higher chances of improving vision than laser alone. In Australia, since the 2008 NHMRC guidelines, there have been significant developments in both the treatment options and treatment schedules for DMO. This working group was therefore assembled to review and address the current management options available in Australia.

Identifiers

PMID36824442
PMCPMC9943607
OpenAlexW4320718881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.