ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Conformational analysis of chromosome structures reveals vital role of chromosome morphology in gene function.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ChromaFactor: Deconvolution of single-molecule chromatin organization with non-negative matrix factorization.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 3D conformations of chromosomes are highly variant and stochastic between single cells. Recent progress in multiplexed 3D FISH imaging, single cell Hi-C and genome structure modeling allows a closer analysis of the structural variations of chromosomes between cells to infer the functional implications of structural heterogeneity. Here, we introduce a two-step dimensionality reduction method to classify a population of single cell 3D chromosome structures, either from simulation or imaging experiment, into dominant conformational clusters with distinct chromosome morphologies. We found that almost half of all structures for each chromosome can be described by 5-10 dominant chromosome morphologies, which play a fundamental role in establishing conformational variation of chromosomes. These morphologies are conserved in different cell types, but vary in their relative proportion of structures. Chromosome morphologies are distinguished by the presence or absence of characteristic chromosome territory domains, which expose some chromosomal regions to varying nuclear environments in different morphologies, such as nuclear positions and associations to nuclear speckles, lamina, and nucleoli. These observations point to distinct functional variations for the same chromosomal region in different chromosome morphologies. We validated chromosome conformational clusters and their associated subnuclear locations with data from DNA-MERFISH imaging and single cell sci-HiC data. Our method provides an important approach to assess the variation of chromosome structures between cells and link differences in conformational states with distinct gene functions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.