Evidence mapPaperPMID 36825938Full record

Trial reportAdvances in respiratory medicine2023

Favipiravir in the Treatment of Outpatient COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Atefeh Vaezi, Mehrzad Salmasi, Forogh Soltaninejad, Mehrdad Salahi, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard, Babak Amra

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Antivirals in COVID-19: A Focus on Pediatric Cardiac Patients.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 therapeutics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atefeh VaeziCancer Prevention Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1829-0494
Mehrzad SalmasiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Forogh SoltaninejadBamdad Respiratory and Sleep Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Mehrdad SalahiDepartment of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Shaghayegh Haghjooy JavanmardDepartment of Physiology, Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Babak AmraBamdad Respiratory and Sleep Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9606-7434
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinding effective outpatient treatments to prevent COVID-19 progression and hospitalization is necessary and is helpful in managing limited hospital resources. Repurposing previously existing treatments is highly desirable. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of Favipiravir in the prevention of hospitalization in symptomatic COVID-19 patients who were not eligible for hospitalization.

methodsThis study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial conducted between 5 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 in three outpatient centers in Isfahan, Iran. Patients in the intervention group received Favipiravir 1600 mg daily for five days, and the control group received a placebo. Our primary outcome was the proportion of hospitalized participants from day 0 to day 28. The outcome was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 through phone calls.

resultsSeventy-seven patients were randomly allocated to Favipiravir and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between groups considering baseline characteristics. During the study period, 10.5% of patients in the Favipiravir group and 5.1% of patients in the placebo group were hospitalized, but there was no significant difference between them (

conclusionsOur study shows that Favipiravir did not reduce the hospitalization rate of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19AmidesHumansOutpatientsPyrazinesSARS-CoV-2AmidesfavipiravirPyrazinesefficacyFavipiravirmild COVID-19outpatientSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36825938
PMCPMC9951951
OpenAlexW4318499405

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.