Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827240›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short form) in adults with asthma.

Joice Mara Oliveira, Thamyres Spositon, Diery Fernandes Rugila, Fabio Pitta, Karina Couto Furlanetto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joice Mara OliveiraResearch and Postgraduate Center, Pitágoras-Unopar University (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-2940
Thamyres SpositonResearch and Postgraduate Center, Pitágoras-Unopar University (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Diery Fernandes RugilaResearch and Postgraduate Center, Pitágoras-Unopar University (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Fabio PittaLaboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy (LFIP), State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Karina Couto FurlanettoResearch and Postgraduate Center, Pitágoras-Unopar University (UNOPAR), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-7228
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is widely used to assess PA and has already been used in adults with asthma; however, its validity has not been yet studied in this population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to verify the convergent and discriminative validity of the IPAQ short form in adults with asthma.

methodsFifty-three adults with asthma (36 females; 48±15 years; 29±6 kg/m²) wore the triaxial activity monitor Actigraph for eight days to objectively measure steps/day, time in light physical activity (PA), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and sedentary behaviour. Participants filled out the IPAQ matching with the same week they wore the Actigraph, with measures of: time of MVPA and total PA/week; categorization of low, moderate or high PA level; time in seated position.

resultsIPAQ self-reported total time of PA/week was weakly correlated with steps/day. The IPAQ categorization correlated moderately with time in light, MVPA and steps/day. Self-reported time in seated position on weekdays was moderately correlated with objective percentage/day of time in sedentary behaviour in the same period. IPAQ categorization in PA levels was able to differentiate between low to moderate and low to high PA levels.

conclusionsThese results cannot confidently infer the convergent validity of the IPAQ to quantify number of steps/day and time spent in PA of adults with asthma. However, this instrument may be useful to categorize patients into three levels of PA.

Indexed as

AsthmaExerciseAdultFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36827240
PMCPMC9956041
OpenAlexW4321749668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.