Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828489›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2023

Accuracy of Three Serological Techniques for the Diagnosis of Imported Schistosomiasis in Real Clinical Practice: Not All in the Same Boat.

María Pilar Luzón-García, María Isabel Cabeza-Barrera, Ana Belén Lozano-Serrano, Manuel Jesús Soriano-Pérez, Nerea Castillo-Fernández, José Vázquez-Villegas, Jaime Borrego-Jiménez, Joaquín Salas-Coronas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Partially purifiedMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Pilar Luzón-GarcíaTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5260-7072
María Isabel Cabeza-BarreraTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.
Ana Belén Lozano-SerranoTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.
Manuel Jesús Soriano-PérezTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.
Nerea Castillo-FernándezTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.
José Vázquez-VillegasTropical Medicine Unit, Distrito Poniente de Almería, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3925-7263
Jaime Borrego-JiménezTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5082-6255
Joaquín Salas-CoronasTropical Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Poniente, Ctra. de Almerimar 31, 04700 El Ejido, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4302-7022
Hospital de Poniente · ES

Funding

Consejería de Salud y Familias PI-0001-2019Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD16/0027/0013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease despite of being a major public health problem affecting nearly 240 million people in the world. Due to the migratory flow from endemic countries to Western countries, an increasing number of cases is being diagnosed in non-endemic areas, generally in migrants or people visiting these areas. Serology is the recommended method for screening and diagnosis of schistosomiasis in migrants from endemic regions. However, serological techniques have a highly variable sensitivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the sensitivity of three different serological tests used in real clinical practice for the screening and diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan migrant patients, using the detection of schistosome eggs in urine, faeces or tissues as the gold standard. We evaluated three different serological techniques in 405 sub-Saharan patients with confirmed schistosomiasis treated between 2004 and 2022: an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), an indirect haemagglutination assay (IHA) and an immunochromatographic test (ICT). The overall sensitivity values obtained with the different techniques were: 44.4% for IHA, 71.2% for ELISA and 94.7% for ICT, respectively. According to species, ICT showed the highest sensitivity (

Indexed as

diagnosisimmunochromatographymigrantsSchistosoma haematobiumSchistosoma mansonischistosomiasisserology

Identifiers

PMID36828489
PMCPMC9959247
OpenAlexW4317434914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.