Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828965›Full record

ReviewGenes & genomics2023

Molecular sensors in the taste system of Drosophila.

Bhanu Shrestha, Youngseok Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Natural Plant Extracts Rescue Memory Deficits inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Connectomic mapping of pharyngeal and gut sensory circuits in adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mosquitoes do not Like Bitter.Journal of chemical ecology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhanu ShresthaDepartment of Bio and Fermentation Convergence Technology, Kookmin University, 77, Jeongneung-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, 02707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2945-2305
Youngseok LeeDepartment of Bio and Fermentation Convergence Technology, Kookmin University, 77, Jeongneung-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, 02707, Republic of Korea. ylee@kookmin.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0459-1138
Kookmin University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost animals, including humans and insects, consume foods based on their senses. Feeding is mostly regulated by taste and smell. Recent insect studies shed insight into the cross-talk between taste and smell, sweetness and temperature, sweetness and texture, and other sensory modality pairings. Five canonical tastes include sweet, umami, bitter, salty, and sour. Furthermore, other receptors that mediate the detection of noncanonical sensory attributes encoded by taste stimuli, such as Ca

methodsOur study explores the taste system of Drosophila melanogaster and perception processing in insects to broaden the neuroscience of taste. Attractive and aversive taste cues and their chemoreceptors are categorized as tables. In addition, we summarize the recent progress in animal behavior as affected by the integration of multisensory information in relation to different gustatory receptor neuronal activations, olfaction, texture, and temperature. We mainly focus on peripheral responses and insect decision-making.

conclusionDrosophila is an excellent model animal to study the cellular and molecular mechanism of the taste system. Despite the divergence in the receptors to detect chemicals, taste research in the fruit fly can offer new insights into the many different taste sensors of animals and how to test the interaction among different sensory modalities.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHumansTasteTaste PerceptionDrosophila ProteinsDrosophilaGustatory receptor neuronMultisensory interactionNoncanonical tasteTaste

Identifiers

PMID36828965
OpenAlexW4321765740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.