Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832046›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2023

Proof of Concept for Sustainable Manufacturing of Neural Electrode Array for In Vivo Recording.

Szu-Ying Li, Hsin-Yi Tseng, Bo-Wei Chen, Yu-Chun Lo, Huai-Hsuan Shao, Yen-Ting Wu, Ssu-Ju Li, Ching-Wen Chang, Ta-Chung Liu, Fu-Yu Hsieh and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Szu-Ying LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Hsin-Yi TsengThe Ph.D. Program in Medical Neuroscience, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wu-Xing St., Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Bo-Wei ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Yu-Chun LoThe Ph.D. Program in Medical Neuroscience, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wu-Xing St., Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Huai-Hsuan ShaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Yen-Ting WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Ssu-Ju LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9686-058X
Ching-Wen ChangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Ta-Chung LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-9454
Fu-Yu HsiehFranz Collection Inc., 13F, No. 167, Sec. 5, Ming Sheng E. Rd., Taipei 10589, Taiwan.
Yi YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, No. 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Yan-Bo LaiDepartment of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, No. 1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan.
Po-Chun ChenDepartment of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, No. 1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan.
You-Yin ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No.155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei 112304, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4869-3857
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taipei University of Technology · TWTaipei Medical University · TWJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Taiwan National Science and Technology Council NSTC-108-2321-B-010-008-MY2, NSTC-109-2221-E-010-004-MY2, NSTC-110-2221-E-027-022-MY3, NSTC-111-2321-B-A49 -005, and NSTC-111-2221-E-A49-049-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing requirements for neural implantation are helping to expand our understanding of nervous systems and generate new developmental approaches. It is thanks to advanced semiconductor technologies that we can achieve the high-density complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor electrode array for the improvement of the quantity and quality of neural recordings. Although the microfabricated neural implantable device holds much promise in the biosensing field, there are some significant technological challenges. The most advanced neural implantable device relies on complex semiconductor manufacturing processes, which are required for the use of expensive masks and specific clean room facilities. In addition, these processes based on a conventional photolithography technique are suitable for mass production, which is not applicable for custom-made manufacturing in response to individual experimental requirements. The microfabricated complexity of the implantable neural device is increasing, as is the associated energy consumption, and corresponding emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, resulting in environmental deterioration. Herein, we developed a fabless fabricated process for a neural electrode array that was simple, fast, sustainable, and customizable. An effective strategy to produce conductive patterns as the redistribution layers (RDLs) includes implementing microelectrodes, traces, and bonding pads onto the polyimide (PI) substrate by laser micromachining techniques combined with the drop coating of the silver glue to stack the laser grooving lines. The process of electroplating platinum on the RDLs was performed to increase corresponding conductivity. Sequentially, Parylene C was deposited onto the PI substrate to form the insulation layer for the protection of inner RDLs. Following the deposition of Parylene C, the via holes over microelectrodes and the corresponding probe shape of the neural electrode array was also etched by laser micromachining. To increase the neural recording capability, three-dimensional microelectrodes with a high surface area were formed by electroplating gold. Our eco-electrode array showed reliable electrical characteristics of impedance under harsh cyclic bending conditions of over 90 degrees. For in vivo application, our flexible neural electrode array demonstrated more stable and higher neural recording quality and better biocompatibility as well during the 2-week implantation compared with those of the silicon-based neural electrode array. In this study, our proposed eco-manufacturing process for fabricating the neural electrode array reduced 63 times of carbon emissions compared to the traditional semiconductor manufacturing process and provided freedom in the customized design of the implantable electronic devices as well.

Indexed as

PolymersXylenesElectrodes, ImplantedMicroelectrodesNervous SystemparylenePolymersXylenescarbon footprintfabless manufacturinglaser etchingneural electrode array

Identifiers

PMID36832046
PMCPMC9953957
OpenAlexW4321107190

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.