Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833339›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

An Iterative Unsupervised Method for Gene Expression Differentiation.

Olga Georgieva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga GeorgievaFaculty of Mathematics and Informatics, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", 125 Tsarigradsko Shosse Blvd., bl. 2, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For several decades, intensive research for understanding gene activity and its role in organism's lives is the research focus of scientists in different areas. A part of these investigations is the analysis of gene expression data for selecting differentially expressed genes. Methods that identify the interested genes have been proposed on statistical data analysis. The problem is that there is no good agreement among them, as different results are produced by distinct methods. By taking the advantage of the unsupervised data analysis, an iterative clustering procedure that finds differentially expressed genes shows promising results. In the present paper, a comparative study of the clustering methods applied for gene expression analysis is presented to explicate the choice of the clustering algorithm implemented in the method. An investigation of different distance measures is provided to reveal those that increase the efficiency of the method in finding the real data structure. Further, the method is improved by incorporating an additional aggregation measure based on the standard deviation of the expression levels. Its usage increases the gene distinction as a new amount of differentially expressed genes is found. The method is summarized in a detailed procedure. The significance of the method is proved by an analysis of two mice strain data sets. The differentially expressed genes defined by the proposed method are compared with those selected by the well-known statistical methods applied to the same data set.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingAnimalsCluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalGene ExpressionMiceclustering analysisdensity-based clusteringdifferentially expressed genesgene expression data

Identifiers

PMID36833339
PMCPMC9956932
OpenAlexW4319317213

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.