ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
How Does the Study MD of pH-Dependent Exposure of Nanoparticles Affect Cellular Uptake of Anticancer Drugs?
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Simulations of Polymer-based Drug Nanocarriers: From Physical and Structural Properties to Controlled Release.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of knowledge about the uptake of NPs by biological cells poses a significant problem for drug delivery. For this reason, designing an appropriate model is the main challenge for modelers. To address this problem, molecular modeling studies that can describe the mechanism of cellular uptake of drug-loaded nanoparticles have been conducted in recent decades. In this context, we developed three different models for the amphipathic nature of drug-loaded nanoparticles (MTX-SS-γ-PGA), whose cellular uptake mechanism was predicted by molecular dynamics studies. Many factors affect nanoparticle uptake, including nanoparticle physicochemical properties, protein-particle interactions, and subsequent agglomeration, diffusion, and sedimentation. Therefore, the scientific community needs to understand how these factors can be controlled and the NP uptake of nanoparticles. Based on these considerations, in this study, we investigated for the first time the effects of the selected physicochemical properties of the anticancer drug methotrexate (MTX) grafted with hydrophilic-γ-polyglutamic acid (MTX-SS-γ-PGA) on its cellular uptake at different pH values. To answer this question, we developed three theoretical models describing drug-loaded nanoparticles (MTX-SS-γ-PGA) at three different pH values, such as (1) pH 7.0 (the so-called neutral pH model), (2) pH 6.4 (the so-called tumor pH model), and (3) pH 2.0 (the so-called stomach pH model). Exceptionally, the electron density profile shows that the tumor model interacts more strongly with the head groups of the lipid bilayer than the other models due to charge fluctuations. Hydrogen bonding and RDF analyses provide information about the solution of the NPs with water and their interaction with the lipid bilayer. Finally, dipole moment and HOMO-LUMO analysis showed the free energy of the solution in the water phase and chemical reactivity, which are particularly useful for determining the cellular uptake of the NPs. The proposed study provides fundamental insights into molecular dynamics (MD) that will allow researchers to determine the influence of pH, structure, charge, and energetics of NPs on the cellular uptake of anticancer drugs. We believe that our current study will be useful in developing a new model for drug delivery to cancer cells with a much more efficient and less time-consuming model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.