Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36834976›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Effects of Adjunct Antifibrotic Treatment within a Regenerative Rehabilitation Paradigm for Volumetric Muscle Loss.

Jessica M Motherwell, Connor P Dolan, Sergey S Kanovka, Jorge B Edwards, Sarah R Franco, Naveena B Janakiram, Michael S Valerio, Stephen M Goldman, Christopher L Dearth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting C1q signaling in fibro-adipogenic progenitors prevents regenerative fibrosis of aged muscle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica M MotherwellDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2752-3832
Connor P DolanDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.
Sergey S KanovkaDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2637-8824
Jorge B EdwardsDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.
Sarah R FrancoDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.
Naveena B JanakiramDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.
Michael S ValerioDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.
Stephen M GoldmanDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2244-1443
Christopher L DearthDoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Montgomery, MD 20815, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3701-0950
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · US

Funding

DoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence HU00012020038United States Army Medical Research and Development Command W81XWH-19-2-0039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of a rehabilitation approach that promotes regeneration has the potential to improve the efficacy of pro-regenerative therapies and maximize functional outcomes in the treatment of volumetric muscle loss (VML). An adjunct antifibrotic treatment could further enhance functional gains by reducing fibrotic scarring. This study aimed to evaluate the potential synergistic effects of losartan, an antifibrotic pharmaceutical, paired with a voluntary wheel running rehabilitation strategy to enhance a minced muscle graft (MMG) pro-regenerative therapy in a rodent model of VML. The animals were randomly assigned into four groups: (1) antifibrotic with rehabilitation, (2) antifibrotic without rehabilitation, (3) vehicle treatment with rehabilitation, and (4) vehicle treatment without rehabilitation. At 56 days, the neuromuscular function was assessed, and muscles were collected for histological and molecular analysis. Surprisingly, we found that the losartan treatment decreased muscle function in MMG-treated VML injuries by 56 days, while the voluntary wheel running elicited no effect. Histologic and molecular analysis revealed that losartan treatment did not reduce fibrosis. These findings suggest that losartan treatment as an adjunct therapy to a regenerative rehabilitation strategy negatively impacts muscular function and fails to promote myogenesis following VML injury. There still remains a clinical need to develop a regenerative rehabilitation treatment strategy for traumatic skeletal muscle injuries. Future studies should consider optimizing the timing and duration of adjunct antifibrotic treatments to maximize functional outcomes in VML injuries.

Indexed as

MedicineMuscular DiseasesAnimalsFibrosisLosartanMotor ActivityMuscle, SkeletalLosartanextremitiesfibrosisregenerative medicineskeletal muscletrauma

Identifiers

PMID36834976
PMCPMC9964131
OpenAlexW4319925232

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.