ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Does Having Rheumatoid Arthritis Increase the Dose of Depression Medications? A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential causal effect of SLE on osteoporosis, and the mediation effect: a Mendelian randomisation study.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping fatigue: discovering brain regions and genes linked to fatigue susceptibility.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling the skin microbial guardians and assailants in psoriasis subtypes: a Mendelian randomization study.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Anxiety and depression in rheumatoid arthritis patients: prevalence, risk factors and consistency between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale/Depression Scale.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) increases the risk of depression. However, studies on the effects of RA on the dose of depression medications are limited. Therefore, in this study, we used two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore whether RA increases the dose of depression medications and gain a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between RA and depression.
methodsTwo-sample MR was used to evaluate the causal effect of RA on the dose of depression medications. The aggregated data on RA originated from extensive genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of European descent (14,361 cases and 42,923 controls). The summary GWAS data for the dose of depression medications were derived from the FinnGen consortium (58,842 cases and 59,827 controls). Random effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and fixed effects IVW methods were used for the MR analysis. Random effects IVW was the primary method. The heterogeneity of the MR results was detected using the IVW Cochran's Q test. The pleiotropy of the MR results was detected using MR-Egger regression and the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test. Finally, a leave-one-out analysis was performed to determine whether the MR results were affected by a specific single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).
resultsThe primary method, random effects IVW, revealed that genetically predicted RA had a positive causal association with the dose of depression medications (Beta, 0.035; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.007-0.064;
conclusionUsing MR techniques, we discovered that having RA increases the dose of depression medications; however, the exact mechanisms and pathways still need to be further explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.