Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836616›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Food for Thought: Proteomics for Meat Safety.

Svetlana Tarbeeva, Anna Kozlova, Elizaveta Sarygina, Olga Kiseleva, Elena Ponomarenko, Ekaterina Ilgisonis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Resistance and Virulence Characteristics ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Svetlana TarbeevaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Anna KozlovaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2147-6679
Elizaveta SaryginaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Olga KiselevaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Elena PonomarenkoInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina IlgisonisInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2020-775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne bacteria interconnect food and human health. Despite significant progress in food safety regulation, bacterial contamination is still a serious public health concern and the reason for significant commercial losses. The screening of the microbiome in meals is one of the main aspects of food production safety influencing the health of the end-consumers. Our research provides an overview of proteomics findings in the field of food safety made over the last decade. It was believed that proteomics offered an accurate snapshot of the complex networks of the major biological machines called proteins. The proteomic methods for the detection of pathogens were armed with bioinformatics algorithms, allowing us to map the data onto the genome and transcriptome. The mechanisms of the interaction between bacteria and their environment were elucidated with unprecedented sensitivity, specificity, and depth. Using our web-based tool ScanBious for automated publication analysis, we analyzed over 48,000 scientific articles on antibiotic and disinfectant resistance and highlighted the benefits of proteomics for the food safety field. The most promising approach to studying safety in food production is the combination of classical genomic and metagenomic approaches and the advantages provided by proteomic methods with the use of panoramic and targeted mass spectrometry.

Indexed as

antibioticsbacteriafood safetyListeriameat packing plantmeat processingPseudomonasresistanceSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID36836616
PMCPMC9966529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.