Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36838262›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2023

The Vaginal Microbiome in Health and Disease-What Role Do Common Intimate Hygiene Practices Play?

Alexandra M Holdcroft, Demelza J Ireland, Matthew S Payne

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The redefined identity ofJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Awareness of the Vaginal Microbiome and Willingness to Undergo Vaginal Microbiota Transplant.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra M HoldcroftSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-3346
Demelza J IrelandSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Matthew S PayneDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2308-3561
The University of Western Australia · AUSt John of God Subiaco Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaginal microbiome is a dynamic, sensitive microenvironment. The hallmark of a 'healthy' vaginal microbiome is currently believed to be one dominated by

Indexed as

female hygienesexual healthvaginavaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID36838262
PMCPMC9959050
OpenAlexW4319844263

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.