Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839838›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

Chemokine Receptors-Structure-Based Virtual Screening Assisted by Machine Learning.

Paulina Dragan, Matthew Merski, Szymon Wiśniewski, Swapnil Ganesh Sanmukh, Dorota Latek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. GPCRVS - AI-driven Decision Support System for GPCR Virtual Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Keras/TensorFlow in Drug Design for Immunity Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulina DraganFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-5322
Matthew MerskiFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1844-6997
Szymon WiśniewskiFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Swapnil Ganesh SanmukhFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-7960
Dorota LatekFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0429-0637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemokines modulate the immune response by regulating the migration of immune cells. They are also known to participate in such processes as cell-cell adhesion, allograft rejection, and angiogenesis. Chemokines interact with two different subfamilies of G protein-coupled receptors: conventional chemokine receptors and atypical chemokine receptors. Here, we focused on the former one which has been linked to many inflammatory diseases, including: multiple sclerosis, asthma, nephritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Available crystal and cryo-EM structures and homology models of six chemokine receptors (CCR1 to CCR6) were described and tested in terms of their usefulness in structure-based drug design. As a result of structure-based virtual screening for CCR2 and CCR3, several new active compounds were proposed. Known inhibitors of CCR1 to CCR6, acquired from ChEMBL, were used as training sets for two machine learning algorithms in ligand-based drug design. Performance of LightGBM was compared with a sequential Keras/TensorFlow model of neural network for these diverse datasets. A combination of structure-based virtual screening with machine learning allowed to propose several active ligands for CCR2 and CCR3 with two distinct compounds predicted as CCR3 actives by all three tested methods: Glide, Keras/TensorFlow NN, and LightGBM. In addition, the performance of these three methods in the prediction of the CCR2/CCR3 receptor subtype selectivity was assessed.

Indexed as

CCR2CCR3cheminformaticschemokine receptorsdrug discoveryGlideG protein-coupled receptorsgradient-boosting machineLightGBMmachine learningmolecular dockingneural networkTensorFlowvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID36839838
PMCPMC9965785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.