Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841882›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2023

What are the key pediatric public policy priorities as the COVID-19 pandemic persists?

Mark R Schleiss, Sallie R Permar, Chandy C John

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark R SchleissDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. schleiss@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2108-9433
Sallie R PermarDepartment of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-4554
Chandy C JohnDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 340 West 10th Street Fairbanks Hall, Suite 6200, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3449-3205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

impactThe COVID-19 pandemic is not over, and its impact is just beginning to be felt on children. COVID-19 vaccines protect both the pregnant patient and newborns, and breastfeeding provides a key component of passive protective immunity. "Long COVID" has contributed to the current crisis in pediatric mental health, and vaccines confer protection against this long-term complication of COVID-19 disease. Vaccine misinformation is not only impacting compliance with maternal and pediatric COVID-19 immunization efforts, but also other routine childhood vaccinations. As a public health priority, we must improve our response to vaccine misinformation and find novel strategies to improve vaccine compliance.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePregnancyPublic PolicyVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36841882
PMCPMC9958307

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.