Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36843095›Full record

SynthesisPrimary health care research & development2023

Health system-related barriers to prenatal care management in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.

Mohammad Mohseni, Haleh Mousavi Isfahani, Ahmad Moosavi, Elham Dehghanpour Mohammadian, Fatemeh Mirmohammadi, Fatemeh Ghazanfari, Shiler Ahmadi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Primary health care research & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Burden of Dengue in Pregnant Individuals: A Systematic Literature Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad MohseniHealth Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1747-6542
Haleh Mousavi IsfahaniSchool of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad MoosaviDepartment of Health and Community Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran.
Elham Dehghanpour MohammadianDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch, Zanjan, Iran.
Fatemeh MirmohammadiDirector of Fatima Midwifery Services & Counseling Clinic, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9189-7666
Fatemeh GhazanfariDepartment of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shiler AhmadiDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9219-1403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate prenatal care (PNC) is essential for improving maternal and infant health; nevertheless, millions of women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) do not receive it properly. The objective of this review is to identify and summarize the qualitative studies that report on health system-related barriers in PNC management in LMICs.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in 2022. A range of electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Knowledge, CINHAL, SCOPUS, Embase, and Science Direct were searched for qualitative studies conducted in LMICs. The reference lists of eligible studies also were hand searched. The studies that reported health system-related barrier of PNC management from the perspectives of PNC stakeholders were considered for inclusion. Study quality assessment was performed applying the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist, and thematic analyses performed.

resultsOf the 32 included studies, 25 (78%) were published either in or after 2013. The total population sample included 1677 participants including 629 pregnant women, 122 mothers, 240 healthcare providers, 54 key informed, 164 women of childbearing age, 380 community members, and 88 participants from other groups (such as male partners and relatives). Of 32 studies meeting inclusion criteria, four major themes emerged: (1) healthcare provider-related issues; (2) service delivery issues; (3) inaccessible PNC; and (4) poor PNC infrastructure.

conclusionThis systematic review provided essential findings regarding PNC barriers in LMICs to help inform the development of effective PNC strategies and public policy programs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesPrenatal CareFemaleHumansInfantMalePregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative Researchlow- and middle-income countriesprenatal carequalitative researchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36843095
PMCPMC9972358

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.