ArticleKansas journal of medicine2023
Impact of Aspirin Supplementation for Pre-Eclampsia Prevention on Neonatal Outcomes.
Article in Kansas journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low-Dose Aspirin Recommendations for Preeclampsia Risk Reduction: A Systematic Review Focused on Black Patients : Current Hypertension Reports.Current hypertension reports · 2026Pooled it
- Early initiation of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in high-risk pregnancies.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pre-eclampsia negatively affects pregnancy. In 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) updated their low dose aspirin (LDA) supplementation recommendation to include pregnant women at moderate risk for pre-eclampsia. In addition to the potential benefit of LDA supplementation for delaying or preventing pre-eclampsia, LDA supplementation can affect neonatal outcomes. The association of LDA supplementation was studied with six neonatal outcomes in a sample of mostly minority pregnant women from Hispanic and Black race/ethnicities that included those of low, moderate, and high-risk designation for pre-eclampsia. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 634 patients. The main predictor variable was maternal LDA supplementation for six neonatal outcomes: NICU admission, neonatal readmission, one- and five-minute Apgar scores, neonatal birth weight (BW), and hospital length of stay (LOS). Demographics, comorbidities, and maternal high-or moderate-risk designation were adjusted for per ACOG guidelines. Results: High-risk designation was associated with neonatal increased rate of NICU admission (OR: 3.80, 95% CI: 2.02, 7.13, p < 0.001), LOS (B = 0.15, SE = 0.04, p < 0.001), and decreased BW (B = -442.10, SE = 75.07, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found with LDA supplementation or moderate-risk designation for NICU admission, readmission, low one- and five-minute Apgar scores, BW, and LOS. Conclusions: Clinicians recommending maternal LDA supplementation should be aware that LDA supplementation did not appear to provide any benefits for the above neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.