Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36845655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Visual-spatial processing impairment in the occipital-frontal connectivity network at early stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Iván Plaza-Rosales, Enzo Brunetti, Rodrigo Montefusco-Siegmund, Samuel Madariaga, Rodrigo Hafelin, Daniela P Ponce, María Isabel Behrens, Pedro E Maldonado, Andrea Paula-Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Iván Plaza-RosalesDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Enzo BrunettiBiomedical Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo Montefusco-SiegmundFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Locomotor System and Rehabilitation, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Samuel MadariagaBiomedical Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo HafelinBiomedical Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Daniela P PonceDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
María Isabel BehrensDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pedro E MaldonadoBiomedical Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Andrea Paula-LimaBiomedical Neuroscience Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, but its pathophysiological phenomena are not fully elucidated. Many neurophysiological markers have been suggested to identify early cognitive impairments of AD. However, the diagnosis of this disease remains a challenge for specialists. In the present cross-sectional study, our objective was to evaluate the manifestations and mechanisms underlying visual-spatial deficits at the early stages of AD. Methods: We combined behavioral, electroencephalography (EEG), and eye movement recordings during the performance of a spatial navigation task (a virtual version of the Morris Water Maze adapted to humans). Participants (69-88 years old) with amnesic mild cognitive impairment-Clinical Dementia Rating scale (aMCI-CDR 0.5) were selected as probable early AD (eAD) by a neurologist specialized in dementia. All patients included in this study were evaluated at the CDR 0.5 stage but progressed to probable AD during clinical follow-up. An equal number of matching healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated while performing the navigation task. Data were collected at the Department of Neurology of the Clinical Hospital of the Universidad de Chile and the Department of Neuroscience of the Faculty of Universidad de Chile. Results: Participants with aMCI preceding AD (eAD) showed impaired spatial learning and their visual exploration differed from the control group. eAD group did not clearly prefer regions of interest that could guide solving the task, while controls did. The eAD group showed decreased visual occipital evoked potentials associated with eye fixations, recorded at occipital electrodes. They also showed an alteration of the spatial spread of activity to parietal and frontal regions at the end of the task. The control group presented marked occipital activity in the beta band (15-20 Hz) at early visual processing time. The eAD group showed a reduction in beta band functional connectivity in the prefrontal cortices reflecting poor planning of navigation strategies. Discussion: We found that EEG signals combined with visual-spatial navigation analysis, yielded early and specific features that may underlie the basis for understanding the loss of functional connectivity in AD. Still, our results are clinically promising for early diagnosis required to improve quality of life and decrease healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseEEGeye-trackingmild cognitive impairment (MCI)spatial memoryvirtual navigation

Identifiers

PMID36845655
PMCPMC9947357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.