Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36847731›Full record

SynthesisJournal of rehabilitation medicine2023

Efficacy of Prolotherapy for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Yose Waluyo, Sari Rajwani Artika, Insani Nanda Wahyuni, Andi Muh Aunul Khaliq Gunawan, Ahmad Taufik Fadillah Zainal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07245121 (Perineural Prolotherapy in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07245121 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Perineural Prolotherapy in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Pain, Perineural Analgesia, Prolotherapy, Knee OsteoarthritisArmsDextrose 5% and Lidocaine, Lidocaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Non-Biologic Injections in Sports Medicine.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yose WaluyoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University. yose.waluyo@med.unhas.ac.id.
Sari Rajwani ArtikaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University; Cerebellum Clinic.
Insani Nanda WahyuniDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University; Cerebellum Clinic.
Andi Muh Aunul Khaliq GunawanFaculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Ahmad Taufik Fadillah ZainalFaculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Hasanuddin University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCurrent treatments for osteoarthritis do not resolve the underlying cause. Dextrose prolotherapy is an alternative method that has been proposed for treatment of osteoarthritis, due to its ability to aid tissue regeneration, improve clinical manifestations, and repair damaged tissue structures, which are pathological conditions in osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy compared with other interventions in the management of osteoarthritis.

methodsElectronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and BioMed Central were searched from inception to October 2021. Search terms included [(prolotherapy) OR (prolotherapies) OR (dextrose prolotherapy)] AND [(osteoarthritis) OR (osteoarthritides) OR (knee osteoarthritis) OR (hip osteoarthritis) OR (hand osteoarthritis) OR (shoulder osteoarthritis)]. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of dextrose prolotherapy with other interventions (injection, placebo, therapy, or conservative treatment) in the treatment of osteoarthritis were included. Potential articles were screened for eligibility, and data were extracted by all authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Study population, methods, and results data were extracted and tabulated by 3 authors.

results12 studies reported that DPT was as effective or even more effective in improving functional outcomes compared with other interventions whilst others found that HA, PRP, EP, and ACS were more effective. 14 studies assessed the effectiveness of DPT and ten of them reported that DPT was more effective in reducing pain compared with other interventions.

conclusionDextrose prolotherapy in osteoarthritis confers potential benefits for pain and functional outcomes, but this systematic review found that the studies to date are at high risk of bias.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeProlotherapyConservative TreatmentGlucoseHumansPainGlucose

Identifiers

PMID36847731
PMCPMC9989868
OpenAlexW4322493093

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.