ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023
Machine Learning for Predicting Micro- and Macrovascular Complications in Individuals With Prediabetes or Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in the prediction of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Diabetic Microvascular Complications.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning Integration of Clinical and Molecular Biomarkers to Predict Vascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Stacked Ensemble Multi-Label Model for Predicting Co-Occurring Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting cardiovascular death in overweight/obese people with prediabetes using machine learning-a proof-of-concept study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Electrocardiogram-Based Mental Stress Detection Amid Everyday Activities Using Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Machine learning screening of risk factors for diabetic microvascular complications and construction of a gradient boosting decision tree predictive model.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of DIANA (Diabetes Novel Subgroup Assessment tool): A web-based precision medicine tool to determine type 2 diabetes endotype membership and predict individuals at risk of microvascular disease.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Development of a 5-Year Risk Prediction Model for Transition From Prediabetes to Diabetes Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Identifying Prediabetes and Diabetes in Normoglycemia.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2024Article
- Red Blood Cell Transfusion for Incidence of Retinopathy of Prematurity: Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Interpretable machine learning models for detecting peripheral neuropathy and lower extremity arterial disease in diabetics: an analysis of critical shared and unique risk factors.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Prediction of cardiovascular and renal risk among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension in the United States using machine learning methods.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Predictive model and risk analysis for peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using machine learning and shapley additive explanation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for prolonged length of stay in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients combined with cerebral infarction.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Identifying the risk factors of ICU-acquired fungal infections: clinical evidence from using machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicro- and macrovascular complications are a major burden for individuals with diabetes and can already arise in a prediabetic state. To allocate effective treatments and to possibly prevent these complications, identification of those at risk is essential.
objectiveThis study aimed to build machine learning (ML) models that predict the risk of developing a micro- or macrovascular complication in individuals with prediabetes or diabetes.
methodsIn this study, we used electronic health records from Israel that contain information about demographics, biomarkers, medications, and disease codes; span from 2003 to 2013; and were queried to identify individuals with prediabetes or diabetes in 2008. Subsequently, we aimed to predict which of these individuals developed a micro- or macrovascular complication within the next 5 years. We included 3 microvascular complications: retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. In addition, we considered 3 macrovascular complications: peripheral vascular disease (PVD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Complications were identified via disease codes, and, for nephropathy, the estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria were considered additionally. Inclusion criteria were complete information on age and sex and on disease codes (or measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for nephropathy) until 2013 to account for patient dropout. Exclusion criteria for predicting a complication were diagnosis of this specific complication before or in 2008. In total, 105 predictors from demographics, biomarkers, medications, and disease codes were used to build the ML models. We compared 2 ML models: logistic regression and gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs). To explain the predictions of the GBDTs, we calculated Shapley additive explanations values.
resultsOverall, 13,904 and 4259 individuals with prediabetes and diabetes, respectively, were identified in our underlying data set. For individuals with prediabetes, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for logistic regression and GBDTs were, respectively, 0.657 and 0.681 (retinopathy), 0.807 and 0.815 (nephropathy), 0.727 and 0.706 (neuropathy), 0.730 and 0.727 (PVD), 0.687 and 0.693 (CeVD), and 0.707 and 0.705 (CVD); for individuals with diabetes, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were, respectively, 0.673 and 0.726 (retinopathy), 0.763 and 0.775 (nephropathy), 0.745 and 0.771 (neuropathy), 0.698 and 0.715 (PVD), 0.651 and 0.646 (CeVD), and 0.686 and 0.680 (CVD). Overall, the prediction performance is comparable for logistic regression and GBDTs. The Shapley additive explanations values showed that increased levels of blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and serum creatinine are risk factors for microvascular complications. Age and hypertension were associated with an elevated risk for macrovascular complications.
conclusionsOur ML models allow for an identification of individuals with prediabetes or diabetes who are at increased risk of developing micro- or macrovascular complications. The prediction performance varied across complications and target populations but was in an acceptable range for most prediction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.