Evidence mapPaperPMID 36849210Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocol for the INFORMED (Individualised Patient Care and Treatment for Maternal Diabetes) Study: a randomised controlled trial embedded within routine care.

Cassy F Dingena, Anvesha Mahendra, Melvin J Holmes, Naomi S Clement, Eleanor M Scott, Michael A Zulyniak

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cassy F DingenaFood Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anvesha MahendraFood Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Melvin J HolmesFood Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Naomi S ClementMedicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Eleanor M ScottDivision of Clinical and Population Sciences, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michael A ZulyniakFood Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK m.a.zulyniak@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-5521
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 217446/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes in pregnancy presents a unique physiological challenge to manage glycaemia while maintaining adequate nourishment for the growing fetus. Women with diabetes who become pregnant are at greater risk of adverse maternal and newborn outcomes, compared with women without diabetes. Evidence suggests that control of (postprandial) glycaemia is key to manage maternal and offspring health but it is not yet clear (1) how diet and lifestyle moderate these shifts across the full duration of pregnancy or (2) what aspects of maternal and offspring health are associated with dysglycaemia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To investigate these gaps, a cross-over randomised clinical trial has been embedded within routine clinical care. Seventy-six pregnant women in their first trimester with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (with or without medication) attending their routine antenatal appointments at National Health Service (NHS) Leeds Teaching Hospitals will be recruited. Following informed consent, data on women's health, glycaemia, pregnancy and delivery will be shared by the NHS with researchers. At each visit in the first (10-12 weeks), second (18-20 weeks) and third (28-34 weeks) trimester, participants will be asked for consent to: (1) lifestyle and diet questionnaires, (2) blood for research purposes and (3) analysis of urine collected at clinical visits. Additionally, participants will be asked to consume two blinded meals in duplicate in second and third trimester. Glycaemia will be assessed by continuous glucose monitoring as part of routine care. The primary outcome is the effect of experimental meals (high vs low protein) on postprandial glycaemia. Secondary outcomes include (1) the association between dysglycaemia and maternal and newborn health, and (2) the association between maternal metabolic profiles in early pregnancy with dysglycaemia in later pregnancy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Leeds East Research Ethics Committee and NHS (REC: 21/NE/0196) approved the study. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to participants and the wider public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN57579163.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPatient CarePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState MedicineBlood Glucosediabetes in pregnancygeneral diabetesnutrition & dietetics

Identifiers

PMID36849210
PMCPMC9972421
OpenAlexW4322505818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.