Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36849504›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Disentangling clustering configuration intricacies for divergently selected chicken breeds.

Anatoly B Vakhrameev, Valeriy G Narushin, Tatyana A Larkina, Olga Y Barkova, Grigoriy K Peglivanyan, Artem P Dysin, Natalia V Dementieva, Alexandra V Makarova, Yuri S Shcherbakov, Marina V Pozovnikova and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anatoly B VakhrameevRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Valeriy G NarushinResearch Institute for Environment Treatment, Zaporozhye, Ukraine.
Tatyana A LarkinaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Olga Y BarkovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Grigoriy K PeglivanyanRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Artem P DysinRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia V DementievaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia. dementevan@mail.ru.
Alexandra V MakarovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Yuri S ShcherbakovRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Marina V PozovnikovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding - Branch of the L. K. Ernst Research Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Yuri V BondarenkoSumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, Ukraine.
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. D.K.Griffin@kent.ac.uk.
Michael N RomanovSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. m.romanov@kent.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Divergently selected chicken breeds are of great interest not only from an economic point of view, but also in terms of sustaining diversity of the global poultry gene pool. In this regard, it is essential to evaluate the classification (clustering) of varied chicken breeds using methods and models based on phenotypic and genotypic breed differences. It is also important to implement new mathematical indicators and approaches. Accordingly, we set the objectives to test and improve clustering algorithms and models to discriminate between various chicken breeds. A representative portion of the global chicken gene pool including 39 different breeds was examined in terms of an integral performance index, i.e., specific egg mass yield relative to body weight of females. The generated dataset was evaluated within the traditional, phenotypic and genotypic classification/clustering models using the k-means method, inflection points clustering, and admixture analysis. The latter embraced SNP genotype datasets including a specific one focused on the performance-associated NCAPG-LCORL locus. The k-means and inflection points analyses showed certain discrepancies between the tested models/submodels and flaws in the produced cluster configurations. On the other hand, 11 core breeds were identified that were shared between the examined models and demonstrated more adequate clustering and admixture patterns. These findings will lay the foundation for future research to improve methods for clustering as well as genome- and phenome-wide association/mediation analyses.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChickensAnimalsBody WeightCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Pool

Identifiers

PMID36849504
PMCPMC9971033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.