Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36853607›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Clinicians' and Patients' Perspectives on Hypertension Care in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population in Primary Care.

Julie C Lauffenburger, Renee A Barlev, Rasha Khatib, Nicole Glowacki, Alvia Siddiqi, Marlon E Everett, Michelle A Albert, Punam A Keller, Lipika Samal, Kaitlin Hanken and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julie C LauffenburgerDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Renee A BarlevDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rasha KhatibAdvocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, Illinois.
Nicole GlowackiAdvocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, Illinois.
Alvia SiddiqiEnterprise Population Health, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, Illinois.
Marlon E EverettAdvocate Heart Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Michelle A AlbertCenter for the Study of Adversity and Cardiovascular Disease (NURTURE Center), Division of Cardiology of Medicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Punam A KellerTuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Lipika SamalDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kaitlin HankenDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ellen S SearsDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nancy HaffDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Niteesh K ChoudhryDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USAdvocate Health Care · USAdvocate Heart Institute · USDartmouth College · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Leveraging electronic health record tools to reduce health disparities for patients with uncontrolled hypertensionR01MD014874 · NIMHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHOUDHRY, NITEESH K, LAUFFENBURGER, JULIE CHRISTINE · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Development of an implementation-ready antihypertensive self-titration intervention to improve US blood pressure controlK23HL161480 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nancy Haff · 2022 to 2026
$826k
Development of a novel medication adherability tool to improve cardiovascular disease managementK01HL141538 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LAUFFENBURGER, JULIE CHRISTINE · 2018 to 2022
$718k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141538NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL161480NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD014874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hypertension control remains suboptimal, particularly for Black and Hispanic or Latino patients. A need exists to improve hypertension management and design effective strategies to efficiently improve the quality of care in primary care, especially for these at-risk populations. Few studies have specifically explored perspectives on blood pressure management by primary care providers (PCPs) and patients. Objective: To examine clinician and patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators to hypertension control within a racially and ethnically diverse health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study was conducted in a large urban US health care system from October 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, among patients with a diagnosis of hypertension from a racially and ethnically diverse population, for a range of hypertension medication use hypertension control, as well as practicing PCPs. Analysis was conducted between June 2021 and February 2022 using immersion-crystallization methods. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perspectives on managing blood pressure, including medication adherence and lifestyle, considerations for intensification, and experiences and gaps in using health information technology tools for hypertension, were explored using semistructured qualitative interviews. These cycles of review were continued until all data were examined and meaningful patterns were identified. Results: Interviews were conducted with 30 participants: 15 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [16.2] years; 10 women [67%] and 9 Black patients [60%]) and 15 clinicians (14 PCPs and 1 medical assistant; 8 women [53%]). Eleven patients (73%) had suboptimally controlled blood pressure. Participants reported a wide range of experiences with hypertension care, even within the same clinics and health care system. Five themes relevant to managing hypertension for racially and ethnically diverse patient populations in primary care were identified: (1) difficulty with self-management activities, especially lifestyle modifications; (2) hesitancy intensifying medications by both clinicians and patients; (3) varying the timing and follow-up after changes in medication; (4) variation in blood pressure self-monitoring recommendations and uptake; and (5) limited specific functionality of current health information technology tools. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of the views of PCPs and patients on hypertension control, the participants felt that more focus should be placed on lifestyle modifications than medications for hypertension, particularly for patients from racial and ethnic minority groups. Participants also expressed concerns about the existing functionality of health information technology tools to support increasingly asynchronous hypertension care. More intentional ways of supporting treatment intensification, self-care, and follow-up care are needed to improve hypertension management for racially and ethnically diverse populations in primary care.

Indexed as

EthnicityHypertensionBlood PressureFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMinority GroupsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID36853607
PMCPMC9975920
OpenAlexW4322617705

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.