Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36854540›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2023

Clinical associations of cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Sudha Raghunath, Yifat Glikmann-Johnston, Vera Golder, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, Eric F Morand, Julie C Stout, Alberta Hoi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sudha RaghunathCentre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia sudha.raghunath@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3062-7328
Yifat Glikmann-JohnstonTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vera GolderCentre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rangi Kandane-RathnayakeCentre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eric F MorandCentre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9507-3338
Julie C StoutTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alberta HoiCentre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-7383
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCognitive dysfunction in SLE is common, but clinical risk factors are poorly understood. This study aims to explore the associations of cognitive dysfunction in SLE with disease activity, organ damage, biomarkers and medications.

methodsWe performed cross-sectional cognitive assessment using a conventional neuropsychological test battery, with normative values derived from demographically matched healthy subjects. Endpoints included two binary definitions of cognitive dysfunction and seven individual cognitive domain scores. Clinical parameters included disease activity (SLEDAI-2K) and organ damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index). We performed regression analyses to determine associations between clinical parameters and cognitive endpoints.

results89 patients with SLE were studied, with median age of 45 and disease duration of 15 years. Organ damage was significantly associated with severe cognitive dysfunction (OR 1.49, CI 1.01-2.22) and worse cognitive test performance in three of the seven individual cognitive domains. In contrast, no significant associations were found between SLEDAI-2K at the time of cognitive assessment and any cognitive endpoints on multivariate analysis. Higher time-adjusted mean SLEDAI-2K was associated with better verbal memory scores but had no significant associations with other cognitive endpoints. The presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies and high IFN gene signature were negatively associated with severe cognitive dysfunction; there were no significant associations with the other autoantibodies studied or any medications. Substance use was significantly associated with lower psychomotor speed. Only 8% of patients who had cognitive dysfunction on testing had been recognised by clinicians on their SDI score.

conclusionsIn SLE, cognitive dysfunction was positively associated with organ damage, but not associated with disease activity, and serological activity and high IFN signature were negatively associated. Cognitive dysfunction was poorly captured by clinicians. These findings have implications for preventative strategies addressing cognitive dysfunction in SLE.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAutoantibodiesCross-Sectional StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansMiddle AgedAutoantibodiesautoimmune diseaseslupus erythematosus, systemicsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID36854540
PMCPMC9980376
OpenAlexW4322627027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.