Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36858459›Full record

ReviewBMJ open respiratory research2023

Healthcare experience of adults with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review of international literature.

Sanduni Madawala, Anthony Quach, Jia Yi Lim, Sanjay Varatharaj, Bianca Perera, Christian Osadnik, Chris Barton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanduni MadawalaDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia sanduni.madawala1@monash.edu.
Anthony QuachDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jia Yi LimDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sanjay VaratharajDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bianca PereraDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christian OsadnikDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris BartonDepartment of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are a group who may be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. This vulnerability has been associated with increased anxiety or fear about exposure to the virus, which may also impact upon experience in healthcare settings. AIM/

objectivesThe aim of this narrative mixed-methods review was to systematically scope, identify and synthesise findings from peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in academic journals describing the healthcare experiences of adults living with COPD independently in the community, following the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019-June 2022.

methodsDatabases including Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Ovid Emcare and CINAHL Plus were searched. Studies were uploaded to Covidence to support selection and appraisal of studies. Studies were appraised for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis of these themes was provided, and qualitative and quantitative findings are interpreted together in the discussion.

findingsThe quality and experience of care for patients with COPD was impacted through the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovations and adoption of technologies such as telehealth and telerehabilitation were well received and mitigated the potential implications of severe disruption to care access to some extent. Patients feared feeling forgotten and experienced isolation and anxiety; however, telerehabilitation and exercise through modalities such as Zoom classes help support social connection and physical activity. IMPLICATIONS: These innovations are likely to be useful to be offered to patients on an ongoing basis, and education and standardised protocols around their use will benefit healthcare providers and patients alike. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022341168.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansPandemicsCOPD epidemiologyCOVID-19emphysematobacco and the lung

Identifiers

PMID36858459
PMCPMC9979589
OpenAlexW4322757509

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.