Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859187›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Personalized hypertension treatment recommendations by a data-driven model.

Yang Hu, Jasmine Huerta, Nicholas Cordella, Rebecca G Mishuris, Ioannis Ch Paschalidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Data-driven decision making in patient management: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Is the response to antihypertensive drugs heterogeneous? Rationale for personalized approach.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang HuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, 8 Saint Mary's St., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jasmine HuertaDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicholas CordellaDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca G MishurisDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ioannis Ch PaschalidisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, 8 Saint Mary's St., Boston, MA, 02215, USA. yannisp@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3343-2913

Funding

Optimizing and Learning Strategies for Protein Docking R01GM135930 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAKILI, PIROOZ · 2019 to 2021
$561k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a prevalent cardiovascular disease with severe longer-term implications. Conventional management based on clinical guidelines does not facilitate personalized treatment that accounts for a richer set of patient characteristics.

methodsRecords from 1/1/2012 to 1/1/2020 at the Boston Medical Center were used, selecting patients with either a hypertension diagnosis or meeting diagnostic criteria (≥ 130 mmHg systolic or ≥ 90 mmHg diastolic, n = 42,752). Models were developed to recommend a class of antihypertensive medications for each patient based on their characteristics. Regression immunized against outliers was combined with a nearest neighbor approach to associate with each patient an affinity group of other patients. This group was then used to make predictions of future Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) under each prescription type. For each patient, we leveraged these predictions to select the class of medication that minimized their future predicted SBP.

resultsThe proposed model, built with a distributionally robust learning procedure, leads to a reduction of 14.28 mmHg in SBP, on average. This reduction is 70.30% larger than the reduction achieved by the standard-of-care and 7.08% better than the corresponding reduction achieved by the 2nd best model which uses ordinary least squares regression. All derived models outperform following the previous prescription or the current ground truth prescription in the record. We randomly sampled and manually reviewed 350 patient records; 87.71% of these model-generated prescription recommendations passed a sanity check by clinicians.

conclusionOur data-driven approach for personalized hypertension treatment yielded significant improvement compared to the standard-of-care. The model implied potential benefits of computationally deprescribing and can support situations with clinical equipoise.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionCluster AnalysisHospitalsHumansMedical RecordsClinical decision supportHypertension prescriptionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36859187
PMCPMC9979505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.