Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860557›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2023

Low limb prostheses and complex human prosthetic interaction: A systematic literature review.

Adan Domínguez-Ruiz, Edgar Omar López-Caudana, Esther Lugo-González, Francisco Javier Espinosa-García, Rocío Ambrocio-Delgado, Ulises D García, Ricardo López-Gutiérrez, Mariel Alfaro-Ponce, Pedro Ponce

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adan Domínguez-RuizInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, México.
Edgar Omar López-CaudanaInstitute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, México.
Esther Lugo-GonzálezInstituto de Electrónica y Mecatrónica, Universidad Tecnológica de la Mixteca, Huajuapan de León, Oaxaca, México.
Francisco Javier Espinosa-GarcíaInstituto de Electrónica y Mecatrónica, Universidad Tecnológica de la Mixteca, Huajuapan de León, Oaxaca, México.
Rocío Ambrocio-DelgadoDivisión de Estudios de Posgrado, Universidad Tecnológica de la Mixteca, Huajuapan de León, Oaxaca, México.
Ulises D GarcíaCONACYT-CINVESTAV, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, col. San Pedro Zacatenco, Ciudad deMéxico, México.
Ricardo López-GutiérrezCONACYT-CINVESTAV, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, col. San Pedro Zacatenco, Ciudad deMéxico, México.
Mariel Alfaro-PonceInstitute of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Manufacturing, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, México.
Pedro PonceInstitute of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Manufacturing, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, México.
Technological University of the Mixteca · MXInstitute for the Future · USInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXTecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A few years ago, powered prostheses triggered new technological advances in diverse areas such as mobility, comfort, and design, which have been essential to improving the quality of life of individuals with lower limb disability. The human body is a complex system involving mental and physical health, meaning a dependant relationship between its organs and lifestyle. The elements used in the design of these prostheses are critical and related to lower limb amputation level, user morphology and human-prosthetic interaction. Hence, several technologies have been employed to accomplish the end user's needs, for example, advanced materials, control systems, electronics, energy management, signal processing, and artificial intelligence. This paper presents a systematic literature review on such technologies, to identify the latest advances, challenges, and opportunities in developing lower limb prostheses with the analysis on the most significant papers. Powered prostheses for walking in different terrains were illustrated and examined, with the kind of movement the device should perform by considering the electronics, automatic control, and energy efficiency. Results show a lack of a specific and generalised structure to be followed by new developments, gaps in energy management and improved smoother patient interaction. Additionally, Human Prosthetic Interaction (HPI) is a term introduced in this paper since no other research has integrated this interaction in communication between the artificial limb and the end-user. The main goal of this paper is to provide, with the found evidence, a set of steps and components to be followed by new researchers and experts looking to improve knowledge in this field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomplex systemscontrol systemshigher educationhuman-prosthetic interactioninnovative educationlower limb amputationpowered prostheses

Identifiers

PMID36860557
PMCPMC9968924
OpenAlexW4320495064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.