Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862339›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Variability in Running Economy of Kenyan World-Class and European Amateur Male Runners with Advanced Footwear Running Technology: Experimental and Meta-analysis Results.

Melanie Knopp, Borja Muñiz-Pardos, Henning Wackerhage, Martin Schönfelder, Fergus Guppy, Yannis Pitsiladis, Daniel Ruiz

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Quo vadis advanced footwear technology research?Journal of sport and health science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Physiological Resilience: What Is It and How Might It Be Trained?Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Melanie Knoppadidas Innovation, adidas AG, Herzogenaurach, Germany. Melanie.Knopp@adidas.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2401-985X
Borja Muñiz-PardosGENUD Research Group, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Saragossa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9191-9033
Henning WackerhageDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5920-5842
Martin SchönfelderDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3003-3378
Fergus GuppyInstitute of Life and Earth Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-9169
Yannis PitsiladisSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6210-2449
Daniel Ruizadidas Innovation, adidas AG, Herzogenaurach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-0638
Technical University of Munich · DEAdidas (Canada) · CAAdidas (Germany) · DEHeriot-Watt University · GBUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of Brighton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced footwear technology improves average running economy compared with racing flats in sub-elite athletes. However, not all athletes benefit as performance changes vary from a 10% drawback to a 14% improvement. The main beneficiaries from such technologies, world-class athletes, have only been analyzed using race times.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to measure running economy on a laboratory treadmill in advanced footwear technology compared to a traditional racing flat in world-class Kenyan (mean half-marathon time: 59:30 min:s) versus European amateur runners.

methodsSeven world-class Kenyan and seven amateur European male runners completed a maximal oxygen uptake assessment and submaximal steady-state running economy trials in three different models of advanced footwear technology and a racing flat. To confirm our results and better understand the overall effect of new technology in running shoes, we conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis.

resultsLaboratory results revealed large variability in both world-class Kenyan road runners, which ranged from a 11.3% drawback to a 11.4% benefit, and amateur Europeans, which ranged from a 9.7% benefit to a 1.1% drawback in running economy of advanced footwear technology compared to a flat. The post-hoc meta-analysis revealed an overall significant medium benefit of advanced footwear technology on running economy compared with traditional flats.

conclusionsVariability of advanced footwear technology performance appears in both world-class and amateur runners, suggesting further testing should examine such variability to ensure validity of results and explain the cause as a more personalized approach to shoe selection might be necessary for optimal benefit.

Indexed as

RunningAthletesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKenyaMaleMarathon RunningShoes

Identifiers

PMID36862339
PMCPMC10185608
OpenAlexW4322757878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.