Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864359›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2023

Determination of in vitro hepatotoxic potencies of a series of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) based on gene expression changes in HepaRG liver cells.

Jochem Louisse, Styliani Fragki, Deborah Rijkers, Aafke Janssen, Bas van Dijk, Liz Leenders, Martijn Staats, Bas Bokkers, Marco Zeilmaker, Aldert Piersma and 3 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jochem LouisseWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands. jochemlouisse@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-2288
Styliani FragkiCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Deborah RijkersWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Aafke JanssenWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bas van DijkWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Liz LeendersWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Martijn StaatsWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bas BokkersCentre for Safety of Substances and Products, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Marco ZeilmakerCentre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Aldert PiersmaCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Mirjam LuijtenCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ron HoogenboomWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ad PeijnenburgWageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 733032Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit KB-37-002-009/010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are omnipresent and have been shown to induce a wide range of adverse health effects, including hepatotoxicity, developmental toxicity, and immunotoxicity. The aim of the present work was to assess whether human HepaRG liver cells can be used to obtain insight into differences in hepatotoxic potencies of a series of PFASs. Therefore, the effects of 18 PFASs on cellular triglyceride accumulation (AdipoRed assay) and gene expression (DNA microarray for PFOS and RT-qPCR for all 18 PFASs) were studied in HepaRG cells. BMDExpress analysis of the PFOS microarray data indicated that various cellular processes were affected at the gene expression level. From these data, ten genes were selected to assess the concentration-effect relationship of all 18 PFASs using RT-qPCR analysis. The AdipoRed data and the RT-qPCR data were used for the derivation of in vitro relative potencies using PROAST analysis. In vitro relative potency factors (RPFs) could be obtained for 8 PFASs (including index chemical PFOA) based on the AdipoRed data, whereas for the selected genes, in vitro RPFs could be obtained for 11-18 PFASs (including index chemical PFOA). For the readout OAT5 expression, in vitro RPFs were obtained for all PFASs. In vitro RPFs were found to correlate in general well with each other (Spearman correlation) except for the PPAR target genes ANGPTL4 and PDK4. Comparison of in vitro RPFs with RPFs obtained from in vivo studies in rats indicate that best correlations (Spearman correlation) were obtained for in vitro RPFs based on OAT5 and CXCL10 expression changes and external in vivo RPFs. HFPO-TA was found to be the most potent PFAS tested, being around tenfold more potent than PFOA. Altogether, it may be concluded that the HepaRG model may provide relevant data to provide insight into which PFASs are relevant regarding their hepatotoxic effects and that it can be applied as a screening tool to prioritize other PFASs for further hazard and risk assessment.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFluorocarbonsAnimalsGene ExpressionHepatocytesHumansLiverRatsAlkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsHBM4EUHepaRG cellsPFASsRelative potencyTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID36864359
PMCPMC10025204

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read63
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.