Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864375›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Interventions to enhance medication adherence in pregnancy- a systematic review.

Anna Davies, Sadie Mullin, Sarah Chapman, Katie Barnard, Danya Bakhbakhi, Rachel Ion, Francesca Neuberger, Judith Standing, Abi Merriel, Abigail Fraser and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Saudi consensus guidance for the management of inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anna DaviesAcademic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK. anna.davies@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-6547
Sadie MullinAcademic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-8651
Sarah ChapmanDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-1605
Katie BarnardNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-4055
Danya BakhbakhiAcademic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-5069
Rachel IonNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-280X
Francesca NeubergerNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-6960
Judith StandingNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4667-1200
Abi MerrielAcademic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-2106
Abigail Fraser *Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-9470
Christy Burden *Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-5238
North Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSub-optimal medication adherence in pregnant women with chronic disease and pregnancy-related indications has the potential to adversely affect maternal and perinatal outcomes. Adherence to appropriate medications is advocated during and when planning pregnancy to reduce risk of adverse perinatal outcomes relating to chronic disease and pregnancy-related indications. We aimed to systematically identify effective interventions to promote medication adherence in women who are pregnant or planning to conceive and impact on perinatal, maternal disease-related and adherence outcomes.

methodsSix bibliographic databases and two trial registries were searched from inception to 28th April 2022. We included quantitative studies evaluating medication adherence interventions in pregnant women and women planning pregnancy. Two reviewers selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, outcomes, effectiveness, intervention description (TIDieR) and risk of bias (EPOC). Narrative synthesis was performed due to study population, intervention and outcome heterogeneity.

resultsOf 5614 citations, 13 were included. Five were RCTs, and eight non-randomised comparative studies. Participants had asthma (n = 2), HIV (n = 6), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; n = 2), diabetes (n = 2) and risk of pre-eclampsia (n = 1). Interventions included education +/- counselling, financial incentives, text messaging, action plans, structured discussion and psychosocial support. One RCT found an effect  of the tested intervention on self-reported antiretroviral adherence but not objective adherence. Clinical outcomes were not evaluated. Seven non-randomised comparative studies found an association between the tested intervention and at least one outcome of interest: four found an association between receiving the intervention and both improved clinical or perinatal outcomes and adherence in women with IBD, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and asthma. One study in women with IBD reported an association between receiving the intervention and maternal outcomes but not for self-reported adherence. Two studies measured only adherence outcomes and reported an association between receiving the intervention and self-reported and/or objective adherence in women with HIV and risk of pre-eclampsia. All studies had high or unclear risk of bias. Intervention reporting was adequate for replication in two studies according to the TIDieR checklist.

conclusionsThere is a need for high-quality RCTs reporting replicable interventions to evaluate medication adherence interventions in pregnant women and those planning pregnancy. These should assess both clinical and adherence outcomes.

Indexed as

AsthmaHIV InfectionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesPre-EclampsiaFemaleHumansMedication AdherencePregnancyAdherenceChronic diseaseMaternal medicineMedicationPerinatal outcomesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36864375
PMCPMC9979410
OpenAlexW4322770953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.