Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864494›Full record

Trial reportTrials2023

Participant recruitment, baseline characteristics and at-home-measurements of cardiometabolic risk markers: insights from the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Josine M Stuber, Beryl A C E van Hoek, Anne L Vos, Edith G Smit, Jeroen Lakerveld, Joreintje D Mackenbach, Joline W J Beulens, SUPREME NUDGE consortium

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josine M Stuber *Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.stuber@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-018X
Beryl A C E van Hoek *Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne L VosAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018, WV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edith G SmitAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018, WV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen LakerveldAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joreintje D MackenbachAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joline W J BeulensAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
SUPREME NUDGE consortium

Funding

Hartstichting CVON2016-04ZonMw 531003001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruiting participants for lifestyle programmes is known to be challenging. Insights into recruitment strategies, enrolment rates and costs are valuable but rarely reported. We provide insight into the costs and results of used recruitment strategies, baseline characteristics and feasibility of at-home cardiometabolic measurements as part of the Supreme Nudge trial investigating healthy lifestyle behaviours. This trial was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring a largely remote data collection approach. Potential sociodemographic differences were explored between participants recruited through various strategies and for at-home measurement completion rates.

methodsParticipants were recruited from socially disadvantaged areas around participating study supermarkets (n = 12 supermarkets) across the Netherlands, aged 30-80 years, and regular shoppers of the participating supermarkets. Recruitment strategies, costs and yields were logged, together with completion rates of at-home measurements of cardiometabolic markers. Descriptive statistics are reported on recruitment yield per used method and baseline characteristics. We used linear and logistic multilevel models to assess the potential sociodemographic differences.

resultsOf 783 recruited, 602 were eligible to participate, and 421 completed informed consent. Most included participants were recruited via letters/flyers at home (75%), but this strategy was very costly per included participant (89 Euros). Of paid strategies, supermarket flyers were the cheapest (12 Euros) and the least time-invasive (< 1 h). Participants who completed baseline measurements (n = 391) were on average 57.6 (SD 11.0) years, 72% were female and 41% had high educational attainment, and they often completed the at-home measurements successfully (lipid profile 88%, HbA1c 94%, waist circumference 99%). Multilevel models suggested that males tended to be recruited more often via word-of-mouth (OR

conclusionsSupermarket flyers were the most cost-effective paid strategy, whereas mailings to home addresses recruited the most participants but were very costly. At-home cardiometabolic measurements were feasible and may be useful in geographically widespread groups or when face to face contact is not possible.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register ID NL7064, 30 May 2018, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR7302.

Indexed as

Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleFood MarketsGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPandemicsPatient SelectionGlycated HemoglobinDietInterventionPhysical activityPreventionSES

Identifiers

PMID36864494
PMCPMC9981252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.